Cases 21 - 30 of 44
Hunt v. State of Oregon et al
as 2:2013cv01821
Respondent:
Baker Co. and State of Oregon
Petitioner:
Bill Aaron Hunt
503) 326-5524 (fax:
Steven T. Wax
503) 947-4794 (fax:
Lynn David Larsen
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Baker v. Shelton et al
as 3:2013cv01265
Plaintiff:
Derrick Coe Baker
Defendant:
George Degner, M.D., Dr. Ole Hansen, Michael Puerini, MD and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2013cv00207
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Fletcher v. Deer Ridge Correctional Institution et al
as 3:2012cv02237
Defendant:
B. Ackley, R. Angelozzi, RN Carpenter and others
Plaintiff:
Ronald William Fletcher
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Baker v. Coursey
as 2:2012cv01894
Petitioner:
Ernest Harold Baker, III
Respondent:
Rick Coursey
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Baker v. MacDonald
as 6:2012cv01344
Plaintiff:
Michael Baker
Defendant:
William Casey MacDonald
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Gutierrez v. Felton et al
as 2:2012cv00542
Defendant:
Darcey Baker, Aaron Felton and State of Oregon
Plaintiff:
Antonio A. Gutierrez
Oregon Board Of Parole Member:
Candace Wheeler
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Baker v. Premo
as 6:2012cv00181
Petitioner:
Lavont Earl Baker
Respondent:
Jeff Premo
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Wilson v. Wheeler et al
as 6:2011cv06105
Defendant:
Darcey Baker, Ronald Brown, Michael T. Dugan and others
Plaintiff:
Mark James Wilson
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Koontz v. Williams et al
as 3:2010cv06227
Defendant:
G. Atkins, T. Baker, Brian Belleque and others
Plaintiff:
Patrick Neal Koontz
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
