Cases 21 - 30 of 1,434
Pattison v. Lombardo et al.
as 3:2022cv00537
Plaintiff:
Dante H. Pattison
Defendant:
Sheriff Joe Lombardo, Brian Sandoval, Steve Sisolak and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
David Thompson v. Isidro Baca, et al
as 22-16702
Plaintiff / Appellant:
DAVID C. THOMPSON
Defendant / Appellee:
ISIDRO BACA, Warden, BRIAN SANDEVAL, ADAM LAXSULT and others
Defendant:
JOHNS, Dr. Terminated per FAC
Charles Garner v. Isidro Baca, et al
as 22-16677
Petitioner / Appellant:
CHARLES GARNER
Respondent / Appellee:
ISIDRO BACA, Warden, ADAM PAUL LAXALT and GABRIELA NAJERA
Smith v. Baca et al
as 3:2022cv00522
Plaintiff:
Jacob Smith
Defendant:
Isidro Baca, Director NDOC and NDOC Caseworker
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Duane Moore Jr v. City of Los Angeles et al
as 5:2022cv01872
Plaintiff:
Duane Moore, Jr
Defendant:
City of Los Angeles, Los Angeles Police Dept., California Highway Patrol and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
(PC) Tillman v. State of California, et al
as 2:2022cv01997
Plaintiff:
William Tillman
Defendant:
State of California, CDCR, Drake and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Goodrum v. State of Nevada et al
as 3:2022cv00399
Plaintiff:
Mitchell Keith Goodrum
Defendant:
State of Nevada, Nevada State Attorney General Office, William Shogren and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Matthew Williams v. Isidro Baca
as 22-16598
Petitioner / Appellant:
MATTHEW WILLIAMS
Respondent / Appellee:
ISIDRO BACA, Warden
(HC) Baca v. Robertson
as 2:2022cv01481
Petitioner:
James Martin Baca, Sr.
Respondent:
The People of the State of California and James Robertson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Keith Warren v. NDOC, et al
as 22-16099
Plaintiff / Appellant:
KEITH A. WARREN
Defendant / Appellee:
NEVADA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS, S. POWERS, HAROLD WICKHAM and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
