Cases 21 - 30 of 65
Nava-Arellano v. USA
as 3:2019cv00032
Respondent:
USA
Petitioner:
Israel Nava-Arellano
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255
(PC) Crosby v. Valencia et al
![Final or Interim Order We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case](/bundles/docketsbrowsing/images/gavel.png)
as 2:2018cv01848
Defendant:
Rachel Nava, R. Valencia, A. Aguilar and others
Plaintiff:
Courtney Jerome Crosby
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2018cv01132
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2018cv01066
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Samuel Archuleta v. Founlong et al
![Final or Interim Order We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case](/bundles/docketsbrowsing/images/gavel.png)
as 1:2018cv00693
Plaintiff:
Samuel Archuleta
Defendant:
K. Founlong, Nava, E. Quezuada and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
v. HERNANDEZ NAVA et al
as 3:2018cv01368
Defendant:
JESUS A HERNANDEZ NAVA and DAVID JENNINGS
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Allen JR., II v. Kernan et al
![Final or Interim Order We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case](/bundles/docketsbrowsing/images/gavel.png)
as 3:2016cv01923
Plaintiff:
Columbus Allen JR., II
Defendant:
Scott Kernan, M. Voong, R. Briggs and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Nava v. Wofford, et al.
![Final or Interim Order We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case](/bundles/docketsbrowsing/images/gavel.png)
as 1:2015cv01707
Petitioner:
Jose Amezcua Nava
Respondent:
Carl Wofford and People of the State of California
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Nava v. Wofford et al
as 1:2015at00904
Petitioner:
Jose Amezcua Nava
Respondent:
Carl Wofford and People of the State of California
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.