Cases 31 - 40 of 58
Robinson v. Nagel et al
as 3:2013cv00422
Defendant:
Mrs. Bobby and Mr. Nagel
Plaintiff:
Kirt D. Robinson
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Wordlaw v. Neven et al
as 2:2013cv00927
Defendant:
Cox, Dwight Neven, Oliver and others
Plaintiff:
Frederick Deon Wordlaw
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Hatlen v. Cox et al
as 3:2012cv00384
Defendant:
Afeaki, Scott Alexander, Barnett and others
Plaintiff:
Kenneth W. Hatlen
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Robinson v. Neven et al
as 2:2011cv01748
Respondent:
Attorney General of the State of Nevada and D.W. Neven
Petitioner:
Ferdinando L. Robinson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Robinson v. Murry et al
as 2:2011cv01664
Defendant:
Bill Brooks, Andrew Duncan, Victor Dunn and others
Plaintiff:
James Robinson
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Robinson v. Williams et al
as 3:2011cv00713
Defendant:
Cheryl Burson, Lee Griggs and Brian Williams
Plaintiff:
Christopher Kirk Robinson
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Robinson v. Attorney General of the State of Nevada
as 2:2011cv01209
Respondent:
Attorney General of the State of Nevada
Petitioner:
James Robinson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Robinson v. Williams et al
as 3:2011cv00520
Defendant:
Associate Warden of Programs - LCC, Cheryl Burson, Lee Griggs and others
Plaintiff:
Christopher Kirk Robinson
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Mizzoni v. State of Nevada ex rel Nevada Department of Corrections et al
as 3:2011cv00358
Defendant:
R. Bannister, E.K. McDaniel, Nevada, State Of and others
Plaintiff:
Joseph L. Mizzoni
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Robinson VS. USA
as 2:2011cv00482
Petitioner:
James Robinson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentenc
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
