Cases 31 - 40 of 53
Kuvaas v. Correctional Medical Services
as 2:2009cv01033
Plaintiff:
Joshua Kuvaas
Defendant:
Correctional Medical Services
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Campbell v. Aldrin et al
as 1:2009cv00211
Petitioner:
Jack Campbell
Respondent:
- Aldrin, Johanna Smith and Correctional Medical Services
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Snodgrass v. Correctional Medical Services Inc.
as 1:2009cv00207
Plaintiff:
Gerald Lee Snodgrass
Defendant:
Correctional Medical Services Inc.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
James Parmer v. Idaho Correctional Corporation, et al
as 09-35362
Plaintiff - Appellant:
JAMES PARMER
Defendant - Appellee:
IDAHO CORRECTIONAL CORPORATION, CORRECTIONAL MEDICAL SERVICES and JOHN DOES, 1-3
Cutler v. Correctional Medical Services
as 3:2008cv00507
Petitioner:
Mark W Cutler
Respondent:
Correctional Medical Services
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Hartshorn v. Correctional Medical Services
as 1:2008cv00308
Plaintiff:
Curtis Glenn Hartshorn
Defendant:
Correctional Medical Services
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Fred Willie v. Randy Blades, et al
as 08-35856
Plaintiff - Appellant:
FRED WILLIE
Defendant - Appellee:
RANDY BLADES, Ex Warden of Idaho State Correctional Institution, DAVID HAAS, Ex-Medical Service Administrator (MSA), STOCKTON, MSA and others
Hanslovan v. Blades et al
as 1:2008cv00100
Plaintiff:
Larry Hanslovan
Defendant:
Randy Blades, Correctional Medical Services, Inc., April Dawson and others
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Gurule v. Correctional Medical Services
as 1:2008cv00244
Plaintiff:
Howard Gurule
Defendant:
Correctional Medical Services
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Reppert v. Correctional Medical Services et al
as 1:2008cv00117
Plaintiff:
Michael Harold Reppert
Defendant:
Correctional Medical Services, Brandon DeMarco, Stewart Tyson and others
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
