Cases 31 - 40 of 462
Carl Eckstrom v. Jeffrey Beard, et al
as 17-55766
Plaintiff - Appellant:
CARL ANDERS ECKSTROM
Defendant - Appellee:
JEFFREY BEARD, in his individual and official capacity as Secretary of Agency CDCR, JOHN DOE, in his individual and official capacity as Facility Captain over Associated Services, S. LUND, in their individual and official capacity as Officer of CMC R & R post and others
James Edwards v. Jeffrey Beard
as 17-55575
Petitioner - Appellant:
JAMES ARTHUR EDWARDS
Respondent - Appellee:
JEFFREY BEARD, Director of CDCR
Hardney v. Ferguson et al.
as 3:2017cv02390
Plaintiff:
John Hardney
Defendant:
Jeffrey Ferguson, Jeffrey Beard and Steven Tucker
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Bradley Dayley v. Jeffrey Beard
as 17-15760
Petitioner - Appellant:
BRADLEY ALAN DAYLEY
Respondent - Appellee:
JEFFREY BEARD
Blair Hall v. Jeffrey Beard
as 17-55497
Petitioner - Appellant:
BLAIR CHRISTOPHER HALL
Respondent - Appellee:
JEFFREY BEARD, Secretary, California Department of Corrections and Rehabilitation
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2017cv00730
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 st Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Eric K'napp v. Edmund Brown, Jr., et al
as 17-15577
Plaintiff - Appellant:
ERIC CHARLES RODNEY K'NAPP
Defendant - Appellee:
EDMUND G. BROWN, Jr., CALIFORNIA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS AND REHABILITATION, CALIFORNIA CORRECTIONAL HEALTH CARE SERVICES and others
Nathaniel Gann v. Jeffrey Beard
as 17-55316
Petitioner - Appellant:
NATHANIEL MARCUS GANN
Respondent - Appellee:
JEFFREY BEARD
Grant Hurlbert v. Kamala Harris, et al
as 17-55280
Petitioner - Appellant:
GRANT DALE HURLBERT
Respondent - Appellee:
KAMALA D. HARRIS, Attorney General, KATHLEEN ANNE MCKENNA and JEFFREY BEARD
Dexter Brown v. Edmund Brown, Jr., et al
as 17-15330
Plaintiff - Appellant:
DEXTER BROWN
Defendant - Appellee:
EDMUND G. BROWN, Jr. and JEFFREY BEARD
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
