Cases 41 - 50 of 63
Clardy v. Hascall et al
as 2:2015cv02098
Defendant:
Jason Bell, Cathy Bryant-Kaae, Timothy Coleman and others
Plaintiff:
Sir Giorgio Sanford Clardy
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Clardy v. Jones et al
as 2:2015cv01241
Defendant:
Jason Bell, Bugher, John and Jane Does and others
Plaintiff:
Sir Giorgio Sanford Clardy
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Gould v. Nooth et al
as 2:2015cv01152
Defendant:
Jason Bell, Jamie Breyman, Anthony Broadus and others
Plaintiff:
Lindsay (Lynn) A. Murch Gould
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Walsh v. Peters et al
as 2:2015cv01012
Defendant:
Jason Bell, John Benitez, John Cannon and others
Plaintiff:
Joshua Vincent Walsh
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Roshone v. Harrison et al
as 2:2014cv01576
Defendant:
Jason Bell, Brooks, Bugher and others
Plaintiff:
Andrew Paul Roshone
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Bell v. Premo
as 6:2014cv00217
Petitioner:
Larry D. Bell
503) 326-5524 (fax:
Steven T. Wax
Respondent:
Jeff Premo
503) 947-4794 (fax:
Lynn David Larsen
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Cufaude v. Nooth et al
as 2:2014cv00116
Defendant:
J. Bell, L. Braun, Coombs and others
Plaintiff:
Nicholas Cufaude
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
McMain v. Peters et al
as 2:2013cv01632
Defendant:
J. Bell, Dr. Elliot-Blakeslee, Collette Peters and others
Plaintiff:
Gordon McMain
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Bell v. Persson
as 6:2013cv01208
Petitioner:
William Bell
Respondent:
Rob Persson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Vega v. Bell et al
as 2:2013cv00931
Defendant:
Mr. Bell, R. Coursey, A. DeJongh and others
Plaintiff:
Nickolas Alonzo Vega
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
