Cases 41 - 50 of 302
(PC) Douglas v. Shirley et al
as 1:2023cv00653
Plaintiff:
Roger Douglas
Defendant:
Heather Shirley, J. Cronjager and Scott Degough
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
(PC) Miller v. Madruga et al
as 1:2023cv00616
Plaintiff:
Rosemary Heather Miller
Defendant:
Lieutenant R. Madruga, Lieutenant C. Corda, M. Dotson and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
(PC) Augustine v. Shirley, et al.
as 1:2023cv00520
Plaintiff:
Carlos Augustine
Defendant:
Heather Shirley, J Cronjager and Scott Degough
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
(PC)Thomas et al v. Shirley et al
as 1:2023cv00470
Plaintiff:
Ricky L. Thomas, Terrence Dunson, Michael Greene and others
Defendant:
Heather Shirley, J. Cronjager and Scott Degough
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
(PC) Green v. Shirley, et al.
as 1:2023cv00505
Plaintiff:
Michael R Green
Defendant:
Heather Shirley, J Cronjager and Scott Degough
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Williams v. State of Nevada et al
as 2:2023cv00631
Plaintiff:
Christopher M. Williams
Defendant:
State of Nevada, Nevada Department of Corrections, Lovelock Correctional Center and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
(HC) Briggs v. Shirley
as 1:2023cv00471
Petitioner:
Johnny Lee Briggs
Respondent:
Heather Shirley
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
(PC) Miller v. Shirley, et al.
as 1:2023cv00510
Plaintiff:
Charles Miller
Defendant:
Heather Shirley, J Cronjager and Scott Degough
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Jackie Rogers v. Heather Shirley
as 23-55300
Petitioner / Appellant:
JACKIE JEROME ROGERS
Respondent / Appellee:
HEATHER SHIRLEY
(PC) Mathis v. Shirley et al
as 1:2023cv00535
Plaintiff:
Kwamaii Mathis
Defendant:
Heather Shirley, Scott Degough and J. Cronjager
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
