Cases 41 - 50 of 370
Raymond Anthony Chatman v. Neil McDowell
as 5:2022cv00559
Petitioner:
Raymond Anthony Chatman
Respondent:
Neil McDowell
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Ronald Bishop v. Neil McDowell
as 22-55324
Petitioner / Appellant:
RONALD STEVEN BISHOP
Respondent / Appellee:
NEIL MCDOWELL, Warden, Warden, Ironwood State Prison
Raymond Griffin v. Neil McDowell
as 22-55284
Petitioner / Appellant:
RAYMOND GRIFFIN
Respondent / Appellee:
NEIL MCDOWELL, Warden
Tommie McDowell, Jr. v. Hulsey, et al
as 22-15266
Petitioner:
TOMMIE LEE MCDOWELL, Jr.
Defendant / Appellee:
HULSEY, WARD, K. CHOLICO-BALTIERRA and others
Timothy McKinney v. Kathleen Allison et al
as 2:2022cv01243
Petitioner:
Timothy McKinney
Respondent:
Kathleen Allison, Acting Warden Neil McDowell and Neil McDowell
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Sanchez v. McDowell
as 3:2022cv00192
Petitioner:
Orlando Sanchez
Respondent:
Neil McDowell
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Eleazar Acosta Hurtado et al v. Neil McDowell et al
as 2:2022cv00229
Petitioner:
Eleazar Acosta Hurtado
Respondent:
Acting Warden Neil McDowell and Neil McDowell
Defendant:
People of The State of California
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Eleazar Acosta Hurtado et al v. Neil McDowell et al
as 8:2022cv00058
Petitioner:
Eleazar Acosta Hurtado
Respondent:
Neil McDowell
Defendant:
People of The State of California
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Humberto Gonzalez v. Neil McDowell
as 22-55036
Petitioner / Appellant:
HUMBERTO GONZALEZ
Respondent / Appellee:
NEIL MCDOWELL, Warden
(PC) McDowell v. Flores et al
as 1:2021cv01710
Plaintiff:
Jonathan Dewitt McDowell
Defendant:
R. Flores, V. Barboza, A. Moreno and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
