Cases 51 - 60 of 87
Rodriguez v. Gore
as 3:2016cv02947
Petitioner:
Pedro Rodriguez
Respondent:
William Gore
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Prado v. Dumanis et al
as 3:2016cv02309
Plaintiff:
Joseph A Prado
Defendant:
Bonnie Dumanis, William Gore, Huff and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Gregg v. People of the State of California et al
as 3:2015cv00887
Petitioner:
Andrew Gregg
Respondent:
People of the State of California and William Gore
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Pines v. People of the State of California
as 3:2015cv00832
Petitioner:
Michael T. Pines
Respondent:
People of the State of California , William Gore and Camilla Harris
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Hill v. San Diego Sheriff's Department Medical Services Division et al
as 3:2015cv00275
Plaintiff:
Joseph Anthony Hill
Defendant:
San Diego Sheriff's Department Medical Services Division, UCSD Medical Center, Alfred Joshua, M.D. and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Poole v. Dumanis et al
as 3:2014cv03044
Petitioner:
Juan L. Poole, II
Respondent:
Bonnie M. Dumanis and William Gore
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Schmitt et al v. Gore et al
as 3:2014cv02937
Plaintiff:
Michael Schmitt and Jeffrey Freihtsikking
Defendant:
William Gore, Morgan and City of Santee Sheriff Dept.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Demery v. Gore et al
as 3:2014cv02551
Plaintiff:
Flynoind F. Demery
Defendant:
William Gore, Itshizeme, RN 3575 and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Richard Paul Roddy II v. Sheriff William Gore
as 3:2014cv01848
Petitioner:
Richard Paul Roddy, II
Respondent:
William Gore
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Richard Paul Roddy II v. Sheriff William Gore
as 2:2014cv05989
Respondent:
Sheriff William Gore
Petitioner:
Richard Paul Roddy, II
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
