Cases 81 - 90 of 244
Moore v. Cain et al
as 2:2017cv02057
Defendant:
Nurse Cagle, Superintendent Brad Cain, Nurse A. Clements and others
Plaintiff:
Kenneth Everett Moore
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Freeman v. Multnomah County Sheriffs Office et al
as 3:2017cv01893
Defendant:
Deputy Beauseau, Deputy Croteaw, Deputy Fray and others
Plaintiff:
Sheik Shareef Freeman
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2017cv01676
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Richardson v. Richmond et al
as 2:2017cv01610
Defendant:
J. Duchek, R. Parker, Richmond and others
Plaintiff:
James Richardson
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Hollinquest v. Payne
as 2:2017cv01423
Defendant:
Jason Bell, Steve Franke, J. Gilmore and others
Plaintiff:
Dasay Hollinquest
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Tapia-Martinez et al
as 3:2017cv01307
Petitioner:
Joaquin Tapia-Martinez
Respondent:
Jeri Taylor
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Howard v. Riley et al
as 2:2017cv01098
Defendant:
Frederick M. Boss, Chase Bank of Oregon, John/Jane Doe and others
Plaintiff:
Stephen Crittenden Howard
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Jones v. Taylor et al
as 2:2017cv01031
Defendant:
Rodney Carey, Heather Nevil and Jeri Taylor
Plaintiff:
Christoper J. Jones
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights
Snyder v. EOCI Medical et al
as 2:2017cv01033
Defendant:
EOCI Medical, Deanna Lozier and Jeri Taylor
Plaintiff:
Dennis Joshua Snyder
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Smith v. Lewis
as 3:2017cv01017
Defendant:
Robert A. Lewis
Unknown:
Taylor R. Hallvik
Plaintiff:
John Garrett Smith
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
