Cases 1 - 10 of 14
Martin v. Valley, et al.
as 1:2023cv00362
Petitioner:
Jeffery E. Martin
Respondent:
Warden Randy Valley and Idaho State Commission of Pardons and Paroles
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Martin v. Ramirez
as 1:2014cv00435
Petitioner:
Jeffery Eugene Martin
Respondent:
Al Ramirez
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Wilde v. Blades
as 1:2013cv00516
Petitioner:
Jeffery B Wilde
Respondent:
Randy Blades
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Miller v. Reinke et al
as 1:2013cv00455
Petitioner:
Jefferson L Miller
Respondent:
Brent Reinke, David Birch, Todd Burgess and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Hall v. Pocatello Police Department et al
as 1:2013cv00118
Plaintiff:
Kent Emmett Hall
Defendant:
Pocatello Police Department, Officer Westfall, Officer Brian Harris and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Martin v. Carlin
as 3:2012cv00598
Petitioner:
Jeffery Eugene Martin
Respondent:
Terema Carlin
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Swann et al v. Corrections Corporation of America et al
as 1:2012cv00577
Plaintiff:
Brian Bernard Swann
Defendant:
Corrections Corporation of America, Trent Gray, Alexander Black and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Swann v. Corrections Corporation of America et al
as 1:2012cv00410
Plaintiff:
Brian Bernard Swann
Defendant:
Corrections Corporation of America, Alexander Black, Gray and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Holm v. Kirkham
as 1:2011cv00595
Petitioner:
Jeffery A Holm
Respondent:
Terry Kirkham
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Abbott et al v. Reinke et al
as 1:2011cv00561
Plaintiff:
Dennis E Abbott, Jeffery T Garner, John Lloyd and others
Defendant:
Brent Reinke, Olivia Craven, Idaho Department of Corrections and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
