Cases 1 - 10 of 16
Azhar Lal v. B. Flores, et al
as 16-16919
Plaintiff - Appellant:
AZHAR LAL
Defendant - Appellee:
B. G. FLORES, M. MILLER, GARRISON, MTA and others
Azhar Lal v. B. Flores, et al
as 13-17208
Plaintiff - Appellant:
AZHAR LAL
Defendant - Appellee:
B. G. FLORES, M. MILLER, GARRISON, MTA and others
Ryan Jamal Spencer v. P Nunley et al
as 2:2012cv06797
Defendant:
B G Dieball, B G Dieball, Coorectional Officer P Nunley and others
Plaintiff:
Ryan Jamal Spencer
Mary Johnson v. USDOJ, et al
as 11-15971
Plaintiff - Appellant:
MARY LEE JOHNSON
Defendant - Appellee:
UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE, U.S. BUREAU OF PRISONS, KATHLEEN HAWK-SWAYERD and others
Lamont Joseph Williams v. Federal Bureau Of Prisons et al
as 2:2007cv05644
Petitioner:
Lamont Joseph Williams
Respondent:
Federal Bureau Of Prisons, B G Compton and U S Penitentiary at Lompoc, California
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federal)
Charles Lowell Kentz v. B G Compton
as 2:2007cv02770
Plaintiff:
Charles Lowell Kentz
Defendant:
B G Compton
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Forma Pauperis Denial
Konrad Orlando Nunez v. B G Compton
as 2:2007cv01926
Petitioner:
Konrad Orlando Nunez
Respondent:
B G Compton and B G Compton
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federal)
Carlos Martinez-Moreno v. B G Compton et al
as 2:2007cv01367
Plaintiff:
Carlos Martinez-Moreno
Defendant:
B G Compton and John Does
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Forma Pauperis Denial
Joe Piazza Jr v. Federal Bureau of Prisons et al
as 2:2007cv01202
Plaintiff:
Joe Piazza, Jr.
Defendant:
Federal Bureau of Prisons, Federal Bureau of Prisons, B G Compton and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Bivens Act
Darrel John La Chapelle v. David McCall et al
as 2:2007cv00845
Plaintiff:
Darrel John La Chapelle
Defendant:
David McCall, Mary Sanchez and B G Compton
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
