Cases 1 - 10 of 12
Nash v. Pacheco et al
as 1:2024cv00142
Plaintiff:
Phillip Nash
Defendant:
Lauren Pacheco, Debney Jaramillo, Gabriel Wilson and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
USA v. Crystal Carvalho-Pakchong
as 23-15039
Plaintiff / Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant / Appellant:
CRYSTAL CARVALHO-PAKCHONG, AKA Crystal Ann-Marie Lehualani Gabriel
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 8:2022cv00021
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 08 U.S.C. § 1329 Writ of Mandamus to Adjudicate Visa Petition
Francisco Alvarado, et al v. State of Hawaii, Department of Public Safety, et al.
as 1:2021cv00268
Defendant:
State of Hawaii, Department of Public Safety, Max N. Otani, Nolan Espinda and others
Plaintiff:
Chauncy Hata, Francisco Alvarado, Robert Gibson and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Andre Luiz Costa Soares v. Chad Wolf et al
as 5:2020cv00984
Petitioner:
Marvin Cua, Carlos Garcia Umana, Mohammed Nurnobi and others
Respondent:
David Marin, James Janecka, William Barr and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Gordon Keola Carvalho v. Paul Thompson
as 2:2019cv04646
Respondent:
Paul Thompson
Petitioner:
Gordon Keola Carvalho
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Carvalho v. Thompson
as 3:2019cv00277
Respondent:
Paul Thompson
Petitioner:
Gordon Keola Carvalho
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Jose Manuel Lopez v. City of Santa Ana et al
as 8:2016cv00172
Respondent:
T R Basham, Best Best and Krieger LLP, Jeff Bowman and others
Petitioner:
Jose Manuel Lopez
James Kula v. Francis Malani, et al
as 08-15870
Plaintiff - Appellant:
JAMES KULA
Defendant - Appellee:
FRANCIS MALANI, ALVIN TANAKA and MICHAEL CARVALHO, individually and in their official capacities
Swift v. Iramina et al
as 1:2008cv00100
Plaintiff:
Benjamin Cortez Swift
Defendant:
Beryl Iramina, Michael Carvalho and Clement Gusman
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
