Prisoner Petitions Cases filed in the Ninth Circuit Courts
Young Jo v. Six Unknown Names Agents, et al
as 23-55463
Plaintiff / Appellant: YOUNG YIL JO
Defendant / Appellee: SIX UNKNOWN NAMES AGENTS, JOSEPH R. BIDEN, President of the United States, DEP HUD and others
Young Jo v. Six Unknown Names Agents, et al
as 23-55336
Plaintiff / Appellant: YOUNG YIL JO
Defendant / Appellee: SIX UNKNOWN NAMES AGENTS, JOSEPH R. BIDEN, President of the United States, DEP HUD and others
Young Jo v. Six Unknown Names Agents, et al
as 22-56074
Plaintiff / Appellant: YOUNG YIL JO
Defendant / Appellee: SIX UNKNOWN NAMES AGENTS, JOSEPH R. BIDEN, President of the United States, DEP HUD and others
Young Jo v. Six Unknown Names Agents, et al
as 22-55748
Plaintiff / Appellant: YOUNG YIL JO
Defendant / Appellee: SIX UNKNOWN NAMES AGENTS, JOSEPH R. BIDEN, President of the United States, DEP HUD and others
Young Yil Jo v. Six Unknown Names Agents et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 2:2021cv07564
Plaintiff: Young Yil Jo
Defendant: Six Unknown Names Agents, Joseph Biden, DEP HUD and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Young Yil Jo v. Six Unknown Names Agents et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 2:2021cv04745
Defendant: Joseph Biden, Proland Management, Mr. Eric Garceti and others
Plaintiff: Young Yil Jo
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Hilton Mincy v. City of Los Angeles, California
as 2:2020cv05921
Defendant: Los Angeles County, California, Jane Doe, Los Angeles Police Department Custodian of Records and others
Plaintiff: Hilton Mincy
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983
Young Yil Jo et al v. Six Unknown Names Agents et al
as 2:2019cv07850
Defendant: Six Unknown Names Agents, Proland Management, City of Los Angeles California and others
Plaintiff: Young Yil Jo, Kum Nam Lee, Krystof Zawadzki and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?