Cases 1 - 10 of 13
(PC) Jacques v. Dobbs et al
as 2:2024cv00478
Plaintiff:
Michael E. Jacques
Defendant:
M. Dobbs and J. Slaton
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
(PC) Dobbs v. Jacob et al
as 1:2023cv01409
Plaintiff:
Dylan Dobbs
Defendant:
Jacob, Well Path, Warden and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Raymond A. Green v. BPH Commissioners et al
as 2:2023cv06339
Petitioner:
Raymond A. Green
Respondent:
BPH Commissioners, Dobbs and Long and McAllister
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
(PC)Cobbs v. Kern County et al
as 1:2023cv00360
Plaintiff:
Leanard Cobbs, Jr.
Defendant:
Kern County, J. Dobbs, B. Pearson and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Dixon v. Broomfield et al
as 4:2022cv01333
Plaintiff:
Gregory J. Dixon
Defendant:
Acting Warden Ron Broomfield, Scott Kernan, Ralph Diaz and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
(PC) Ausborn v. Kern County Sheriff Dept. et al
as 1:2022cv00210
Plaintiff:
Randy Ausborn
Defendant:
Kern County Sheriff Dept., Kern Medical Hospital, Lt Dobbs and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Ennis v. Kelly et al
as 2:2018cv01126
Plaintiff:
Joseph L. Ennis
Defendant:
L. Kelly, Whitehead, M. Dobbs and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Goods v. Baughman et al
as 2:2018cv00732
Plaintiff:
Gregory Goods
Defendant:
David Baughman, Whitehead and Dobbs
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Ennis v. Hayes et al
as 2:2014cv02171
Plaintiff:
Joseph L Ennis
Defendant:
J. Hayes, L. Dacio, M. Stein and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Lena et al v. The Superior Court of California for San Mateo County et al
as 3:2012cv00271
Petitioner:
Michael Angelo Lena
Respondent:
The Superior Court of California for San Mateo County, Alan Haverty, San Mateo County Office of the District Attorney and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
