Cases 1 - 10 of 13
Jackie Robinson v. Audrey King, et al
as 16-16560
Plaintiff - Appellant:
JACKIE ROBINSON
Defendant - Appellee:
AUDREY KING and DAVID LANDRUM, Acting Chief of Police Services
George Allen, et al v. Stephen Mayberg, et al
as 13-16250
Plaintiff - Appellant:
GEORGE N. ALLEN, WAYNE P. DEBERRY, DARRYELL FRAZIER and others
Defendant - Appellee:
STEPHEN MAYBERG, Director, California Mental Health Department, W. T. VOSS, GARY RENZAGLIA and others
George Allen, et al v. Stephen Mayberg, et al
as 12-17184
Plaintiff:
GEORGE N. ALLEN, RAYMOND AMADEO, MANSFIELD R. BROWN and others
Plaintiff - Appellant:
JACKIE ROBINSON
Defendant - Appellee:
STEPHEN MAYBERG, Director, California Mental Health Department, W. T. VOSS, GARY RENZAGLIA and others
Jackie Robinson v. Stephen Mayberg, et al
as 10-56117
Plaintiff - Appellant:
JACKIE ROBINSON
Respondent - Appellee:
STEPHEN MAYBERG and ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA
Jackie Robinson v. Miriam Joya, et al
as 10-15666
Plaintiff - Appellant:
JACKIE ROBINSON
Defendant - Appellee:
MIRIAM JOYA, Senior Psychiatric Technician, DUVALL, Hospital Police Officer, OFELIA CORONA, Senior Psychiatric Technician and others
Jackie Robinson v. R. Vega
as 10-55017
Plaintiff - Appellant:
JACKIE ROBINSON
Defendant - Appellee:
R. DE LA VEGA, Deputy
Robinson v. Mayberg et al
as 3:2009cv00346
Petitioner:
Jackie Robinson
Respondent:
Stephen Mayberg and The Attorney General of the State of California
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Robinson v. Curry
as 3:2008cv04565
Petitioner:
Jackie Robinson
Respondent:
Ben Curry
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Robinson v. Joya et al
as 1:2008cv01339
Plaintiff:
Jackie Robinson
Defendant:
Miriam Joya, Maria Zavala and Coalinga State Hospital
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Jackie Robinson v. R. Vega
as 08-56308
Plaintiff - Appellant:
JACKIE ROBINSON
Defendant - Appellee:
R. DE LA VEGA, Deputy
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
