Cases 1 - 10 of 93
Derrick M. Wright v. Leanna Lundy
as 2:2024cv08047
Petitioner:
Derrick Munzel Wright, Jr.
Respondent:
Leanna Lundy
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Chavez v. Lundy
as 5:2024cv06491
Petitioner:
Irvin Chavez
Respondent:
Acting Warden Leanna Lundy
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Pierre Haobsh v. State of California et al
as 2:2024cv07511
Plaintiff:
Pierre Haobsh
Defendant:
S. Kadada, M.D., Leanna Lundy, Dr. Christina Galstian and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Gerald J. Jones v. Leanna Lundy et al
as 2:2024cv07042
Defendant:
Navjot Sekhon, Leanna Lundy, S. Kadada and others
Plaintiff:
Gerald J. Jones
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Bob Bejarano v. Leanna Lundy
as 2:2024cv06977
Petitioner:
Bob Bejarano
Respondent:
Leanna Lundy
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Marcus A. Smith v.Leanne Lundy
as 2:2024cv06814
Plaintiff:
Marcus A. Smith
Defendant:
Leanne Lundy
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Wilson v. Lundy
as 3:2024cv04258
Defendant:
Warden Leanna Lundy
Plaintiff:
Patrick Wilson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Anton Michael Kubica v. Leanna Lundy
as 2:2024cv04852
Respondent:
Leanna Lundy
Petitioner:
Anton M Kubica
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Daniel Harper v. California State Prison Lancaster et al
as 2:2024cv04885
Defendant:
California State Prison Lancaster, Leanna Lundy and John Doe
Plaintiff:
Daniel James Harper
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Garcia Nava v. Lundy
as 3:2024cv02808
Petitioner:
Juan L. Garcia Nava
Respondent:
Warden Leanna Lundy
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
