Cases 1 - 7 of 7
Marion Saba, et al v. Gary Garside
as 18-15731
Plaintiff - Appellee:
MARION SABA, on behalf of herself and as personal representative of: estate of Scott Saba, RICHARD SABA, father of: deceased Scott Saba, MATTHEW SABA, adult son of: deceased Scott Saba and others
Defendant - Appellant:
GARY WAYNE GARSIDE, individually and in his official capacity
Marion Saba, et al v. Lori Fresquez
as 17-17159
Plaintiff - Appellee:
MARION SABA, on behalf of herself and as personal representative of: estate of Scott Saba, RICHARD SABA, father of: deceased Scott Saba, MATTHEW SABA, adult son of: deceased Scott Saba and others
Defendant - Appellant:
LORI JEAN FRESQUEZ, individually and in her official capacity - a married woman
Marion Saba, et al v. Daniel Eaton, et al
as 17-16373
Plaintiff - Appellee:
MARION SABA, on behalf of herself and as personal representative of: estate of Scott Saba, RICHARD SABA, father of: deceased Scott Saba, MATTHEW SABA, adult son of: deceased Scott Saba and others
Defendant - Appellant:
DANIEL L. EATON, individually and in his official capacity - a married man and TAMARA EATON, a married woman
Carlos Cazares v. N. Evan
as 11-55702
Petitioner - Appellant:
CARLOS JESUS CAZARES
Respondent - Appellee:
N. S. EVANS, Warden, Salinas Valley State Prison
Thomas Clinton v. CDC, et al
as 08-17288
Plaintiff - Appellant:
THOMAS CLINTON
Defendant - Appellee:
CALIFORNIA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS, CALIFORNIA CORRECTIONAL CENTER, K. PROSPER and others
Thomas Clinton v. California Department of Corre, et al
as 08-16377
Plaintiff - Appellant:
THOMAS CLINTON
Defendant - Appellee:
CALIFORNIA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS, CALIFORNIA CORRECTIONAL CENTER, K. PROSPER and others
Thomas Clinton v. California Department of Corre, et al
as 08-16121
Plaintiff - Appellant:
THOMAS CLINTON
Defendant - Appellee:
CALIFORNIA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS, CALIFORNIA CORRECTIONAL CENTER, K. PROSPER and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
