Cases 1 - 10 of 37
(PC) Kern v. Lester et al
as 2:2024cv00740
Plaintiff:
James Kern and James Curtis Kern
Defendant:
Katherine Lester, Guillermo Marquez, Hall and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Sivak v. Forrest et al
as 3:2023cv06251
Plaintiff:
Lacey Sivak
Defendant:
Danielle J. Forrest and Judge Richard Paez
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Jose Carlos Valdez Paez v. Warden
as 2:2023cv09989
Petitioner:
Jose Carlos Valdez Paez
Respondent:
Warden
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federal)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2023cv05995
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
(PC) Ellis v. Williams et al
as 2:2023cv01962
Plaintiff:
Benjamin F. Ellis
Defendant:
Gabriel Williams, Elenita Paez and Kim Petersen
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Ronnie Joseph Paez v. Colton Police Station et al
as 5:2022cv00110
Plaintiff:
Ronnie Joseph Paez
Defendant:
Colton Police Station and Coton Police Officers
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights
Billy Driver v. 2020/2019 Judicial Civil Conspiracy and Clerk et al
as 2:2020cv03144
Defendant:
George H. Wu, T. Paez, District Judge George W. Wu and others
Plaintiff:
Billy Driver, Jr
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
(PC) Zelaya v. Valley State Prison et al
as 1:2020cv00033
Plaintiff:
Oscar Zelaya
Defendant:
Paez, Raythel Fisher, Jr., Clements and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
(PC) Phillips v. Valley State Prison et al
as 1:2020cv00022
Defendant:
Paez, Raythel Fisher, Jr., Clements and others
Plaintiff:
David E. Phillips
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
(PC) Ebel v. Valley State Prison et al
as 1:2020cv00034
Defendant:
Paez, Raythel Fisher, Jr., Clements and others
Plaintiff:
Vladimir R. Ebel
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
