Cases 1 - 10 of 233
(PC)Moten v. Pheiffer et al
as 1:2024cv00043
Plaintiff:
Sharrod Moten
Defendant:
Christian Pheiffer, Miranda, Montez and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Ramirez v. Pratt et al
as 3:2024cv00232
Petitioner:
Martin Ponce Ramirez
Defendant:
Rob Bonta
Respondent:
Glenn E. Pratt
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Ramirez v. Pratt
as 3:2023cv02175
Petitioner:
Martin Ponce Ramirez
Respondent:
Glenn E. Pratt and Rob Bonta
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
(PC) Ponce v. Ramadan et al
as 1:2023cv01193
Plaintiff:
Pablo Jesus Ponce
Defendant:
Ramadan and Hitchman
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Javier Castellon v. USA
as 23-55568
Petitioner / Appellant:
JAVIER PONCE CASTELLON
Respondent / Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
(HC) Castellon v. Warden
as 2:2023cv01408
Petitioner:
Javier Ponce Castellon
Respondent:
Warden
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus
Donnell Young v. United States of America et al
as 2:2023cv01388
Plaintiff:
Donnell Tyrone Young
Defendant:
United States of America, Mark Marquesse, Felisha Ponce and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Mario Ponce v. Brian Cates, et al
as 22-56168
Petitioner / Appellant:
MARIO VIDAL PONCE
Respondent / Appellee:
BRIAN CATES, Warden and KATHLEEN ALLISON, Secretary CDCR
(PC) Thomas v. Weaver et al
as 1:2022cv01492
Plaintiff:
Prentice Ray Thomas
Defendant:
B. Weaver, Justin Garcia, Adriana Ponce and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Tommy Ponce, Jr. v. M. Solorio, et al
as 22-16758
Plaintiff / Appellant:
TOMMY GABRIEL PONCE, Jr.
Defendant / Appellee:
M. SOLORIO, Correctional Counselor I at CSATF, I. RUIZ, Trust Department Employee at CSATF, B. EDWARDS, Chief Executive Officer at CSATF and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
