Cases 1 - 9 of 9
Joshua Bland v. Robert Rodriguez, et al
as 22-16492
Plaintiff / Appellant:
JOSHUA DAVIS BLAND
Defendant / Appellee:
ROBERT RODRIGUEZ, Lieutenant at Kern Valley State Prison, CHAD D. HUCKLEBERRY, Sergeant at Kern Valley State Prison, MIGUEL A. FRANCO, Correctional Officer at Kern Valley State Prison and others
Antonin Guzman v. County of Orange et al
as 8:2021cv01425
Plaintiff:
Antonin Guzman
Defendant:
County of Orange, Alfredo Rasch, Unknown Defendant and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Rodriguez v. USA
as 3:2020cv00757
Respondent:
USA
Petitioner:
Robert Rodriguez
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255
(PC) Bland v. Rodriguez et al
as 1:2020cv00478
Defendant:
Robert Rodriguez, Mariana Garay, Lissette Melendrez and others
Plaintiff:
Joshua D. Bland and Joshua Bland
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Jimmy McDonald v. Greg Clark, et al
as 13-17006
Plaintiff - Appellant:
JIMMY MCDONALD
Defendant - Appellee:
GREG CLARK, Correctional Officer, ADAM CANO, Correctional Officer, HOWARD ROBERTS, Correctional Officer and others
Thomas Pitts, Jr. v. Melvin Hunter, et al
as 12-55494
Plaintiff - Appellant:
THOMAS EARL PITTS, Jr.
Defendant - Appellee:
MELVIN HUNTER, Exec. Director, ASH, ALVAREZ, Hosp. Police Officer, AMANDA FERRERI, Hosp. Police Officer and others
Thomas Earl Pitts, Jr. v. Melvin Hunter, et al
as 09-56127
Plaintiff - Appellant:
THOMAS EARL PITTS, Jr.
Defendant - Appellee:
MELVIN HUNTER, Exec. Director, ASH, ALVAREZ, Hosp. Police Officer, AMANDA FERRERI, Hosp. Police Officer and others
Robert Rodriguez v. Derral G. Adams
as 2:2008cv07172
Petitioner:
Robert Rodriguez
Respondent:
Derral G. Adams
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Riches v. Tarantino et al
as 3:2008cv00404
Plaintiff:
Jonathan Lee Riches
Defendant:
Quentin Tarantino and Robert Rodriguez
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
