Cases 11 - 17 of 17
Pension Trust Fund For Operating Engineers et al v. Hillsdale Rock Co., Inc. et al
as 4:2010cv05509
Plaintiff:
Pension Trust Fund For Operating Engineers , F. G. Crosthwaite and Russell E. Burns
Defendant:
Hillsdale Rock Co., Inc., Hillsdale Rock Co., Hank Matoza Trust and others
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1451
Steve Harris, et al v. Amgen, Inc., et al
as 10-56014
Plaintiff - Appellant:
STEVE HARRIS, DENNIS F. RAMOS, AKA Dennis Ramos, DONALD HANKS and others
Defendant - Appellee:
AMGEN, INC., AMGEN MANUFACTURING, LIMITED, FRANK J. BIONDI, Jr. and others
Defendant:
DENNIS M. FENTON, RICHARD NANULA, THE FIDUCIARY COMMITTEE and others
Donald Hanks v. Amgen, Inc. et al
as 2:2009cv03973
Plaintiff:
Donald Hanks, Donald Hanks, Donald Hanks and others
Defendant:
Amgen, Inc., Kevin W. Sharer, Richard D. Nanula and others
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1132 E.R.I.S.A.-Employee Benefits
Swain v. Dywidag-Systems International USA, I et al
as 5:2009cv01096
Plaintiff:
Tonja Swain, Tonja Swain and Tonja Swain
Defendant:
Dywidag-Systems International USA, Inc., Dywidag-Systems International USA, Inc., Field Ironworkers Apprenticeship and Training Program and others
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Norman et al v. Dell, Inc. et al
as 6:2007cv06028
Plaintiff:
David Norman, David Norman, David Norman and others
Defendant:
Dell, Inc., Dell, Inc., Dell, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201 Fair Labor Standards Act - Denial of Overtime Compensation
Bagneschi v. Harte hanks Shoppers, Inc.
as 3:2007cv00701
Plaintiff:
Susan Bagneschi
Defendant:
Harte Hanks Shoppers, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
In re: Cintas Corp. Overtime Pay Arbitration Litigation
as 3:2006md01781
Plaintiff:
Cintas Corporation
Defendant:
Robert J. Abel, David J. Abrahamsen, Nicholas Ackerman and others
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201 Fair Labor Standards Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
