Cases 21 - 27 of 27
Stevenson Tan, et al v. California State Automobile A
as 08-57041
Plaintiff - Appellant:
STEVENSON TAN, an individual, on behalf of himself and on behalf of all persons similarly situated, DEEPAK MATHUR, an individual, on behalf of himself and on behalf of all persons similarly situated, CLAUDIA ADAMS, an individual, on behalf of herself and all persons similarly situated and others
Defendant - Appellee:
CALIFORNIA STATE AUTOMOBILE ASSOCIATION, a California Corporation
Arthur Ellerd v. County of Los Angeles
as 2:2008cv04289
Plaintiff:
Arthur Ellerd, Jose J Troconis, Craig Y Abe and others
Defendant:
County of Los Angeles
Alternative Dispute Resolution (Adr) Provider:
Steven M Schneider
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201 Denial of Overtime Compensation
Al Franco et al v. City of Victorville et al
as 2:2007cv07670
Plaintiff:
Al Franco, Al Franco, Al Franco and others
Defendant:
City of Victorville, Victorville Fire Department and DOES 1 through 10 inclusive
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Fair Labor Standards
Tan v. California State Automobile Association et al
as 8:2007cv01011
Plaintiff:
Stevenson Tan, Stevenson Tan and Stevenson Tan
Defendant:
California State Automobile Association and DOES
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201 Fair Labor Standards Act
Northwest Administrators Inc v. Tan Trucking LLC
as 2:2007cv01192
Plaintiff:
Northwest Administrators Inc
Defendant:
Tan Trucking LLC
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1132 E.R.I.S.A.-Employee Benefits
Northwest Administrators Inc v. Tan Trucking LLC
as 2:2007cv00907
Plaintiff:
Northwest Administrators Inc
Defendant:
Tan Trucking LLC
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1132 E.R.I.S.A.-Employee Benefits
J Bradley Ginsberg v. Smarthome.com Inc, et al
as 8:2001cv00334
Plaintiff:
J Bradley Ginsberg
Defendant:
Smarthome.com Inc and David Tan
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201 Fair Labor Standards Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
