Cases 71 - 80 of 117
Lakesha Angeletta-Mayes v. County of Riverside et al
as 5:2022cv01054
Plaintiff:
Lakesha Angeletta-Mayes
Defendant:
County of Riverside, a legal subdivision of the State of California, County of Riverside and Does 1-10, inclusive
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 704 Labor Litigation
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2022cv03611
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1132 E.R.I.S.A.-Employee Benefits
Drevaleva v. Pollak et al
as 3:2021cv01664
Defendant:
The Narayan Travelstead Professional Law Corporation, Justice Tracie Brown, Justice Stuart Pollak and others
Plaintiff:
Tatyana Evgenievna Drevaleva
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Cecily Fernandez et al v. County of San Bernardino, et al
as 5:2020cv01555
Defendant:
COUNTY OF SAN BERNARDINO, a legal subdivision of the State of California,, Does 1-10 and County of San Bernardino
Plaintiff:
Kenyada Wagoner and Cecily Fernandez
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201
Violet Marquez et al v. County of San Bernardino et al
as 5:2020cv00693
Plaintiff:
Chanteil Guy, Longina Shaw and Violet Marquez
Defendant:
COUNTY OF SAN BERNARDINO, a legal subdivision of the State of California,, County of San Bernardino and Does 1-10, inclusive
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201
Jodi Garness et al v. County of San Bernardino et al
as 5:2020cv00585
Plaintiff:
Kathy Hansen, Regina Rogers, Jodi Garness and others
Defendant:
County of San Bernardino, a legal subdivision of the State of California, County of San Bernardino and Does 1-10, inclusive
Petitioner:
COUNTY OF SAN BERNARDINO, a legal subdivision of the State of California,
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201
The State of California et al v. Vitas Healthcare Corporation of California, et al
as 3:2020cv01650
Defendant:
Vitas Healthcare Corporation of California and Vitas Health Services of California, Inc.
Plaintiff:
The State of California and Almea Luis
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Newell v. Ensign United States Drilling (California) Inc.
as 1:2019cv01314
Plaintiff:
Louis Newell
Defendant:
Ensign United States Drilling (California) Inc.
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201
Board of Trustees of the Teamsters Miscellaneous Security Trust Fund v. City of El Segundo
as 2:2019cv06339
Plaintiff:
BOARD OF TRUSTEES OF THE TEAMSTERS MISCELLANEOUS SECURITY TRUST FUND in their capacity as fiduciaries for the TEAMSTERS MISCELLANEOUS SECURITY TRUST FUND and Board of Trustees of the Teamsters Miscellaneous Security Trust Fund
Defendant:
CITY OF EL SEGUNDO, a political subdivision of the State of California and City of El Segundo
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 185
Trustees of the Operating Engineers Pension Trust et al v. Smith-Emery Company
as 2:2019cv04058
Counter Defendant:
Trustees of the Operating Engineers Health and Welfare Fund, Trustees of the Operating Engineers Training Trust, Trustees of the Operating Engineers Local 12 Defined Contribution Plan and others
Defendant:
Smith-Emery Company
Plaintiff:
Trustees of the Operating Engineers Vacation-Holiday Savings Trust, Contract Administration Fund, Fund for Construction Industry Advancement and others
Counter Claimant:
James E Partridge
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1145 E.R.I.S.A.
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
