Cases 1 - 10 of 19
William Baber v. Nespresso USA, Inc. et al
as 3:2021cv00487
Defendant:
Nestle U.S.A, Inc. and Nespresso USA, Inc.
Plaintiff:
William Baber
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Jimenez v. Nestle Waters North America, Inc.
as 1:2020cv01762
Plaintiff:
Jose Pablo Jimenez
Defendant:
Nestle Waters North America, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Petition for Removal
Jimenez v. Nestle Waters North America, Inc.
as 1:2020at01023
Defendant:
Nestle Waters North America, Inc.
Plaintiff:
Jose Pable Jimenez
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1446
Zine v. Nespresso USA, Inc. et al
as 3:2020cv05144
Defendant:
Nestle USA, Inc., a Delaware corporation, DOES 1 THROUGH 10, INCLUSIVE and Nespresso USA, Inc.
Plaintiff:
Omar Zine
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
William Baber v. Nespresso USA, Inc. et al
as 2:2020cv06533
Defendant:
Nestle USA, Inc., DOES 1 through 100, Inclusive,, Nespresso USA, Inc. and others
Plaintiff:
William Baber
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Nestle USA, Inc. v. Clark et al
as 1:2019cv00176
Defendant:
Matthew Clark and Law Offices of Mark S. Nelson
Plaintiff:
Nestle USA, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1132
Martinez v. Nestle USA Inc.
as 1:2018cv01582
Defendant:
Nestle USA Inc. and Nestle Dreyer's Ice Cream Company
Plaintiff:
Gabriel Martinez
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 704
Edward Medina v. Nestle USA, Inc. et al
as 2:2018cv07408
Defendant:
Nestle USA, Inc., DOES 1 through 20 and Does 1 through 20, inclusive
Plaintiff:
Edward Medina
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Suarez v. Nestle Waters North America, Inc.,
as 4:2015cv04259
Defendant:
Nestle Waters North America, Inc.,
Plaintiff:
Robert Suarez
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Northwest Administrators Inc v. Nestle Dreyer's Ice Cream Company
as 2:2015cv00783
Plaintiff:
Northwest Administrators Inc
Defendant:
Nestle Dreyer's Ice Cream Company
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1132
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
