Cases filed in the Ninth Circuit Courts
Cases 91 - 100 of 284
Nathan Caetano v. Stuart Sherman
as 20-70089
Respondent: STUART SHERMAN, Warden
Petitioner: NATHAN CAETANO
Joseph George v. USA, et al
as 19-56528
Defendant / Appellee: JASON CONGE, Deputy, JOHN DOE, Owner Mission Valley Orn and Marillo Facial Surgery, MARVIN MALECHA, President New School of Architecture and others
Plaintiff / Appellant: JOSEPH GEORGE
Mauricio Godoy v. Edmund Brown, Jr., et al
as 19-17499
Defendant / Appellee: JEAN WEISS, MCSP-Md.-ADA-Associate Warden, GENEVIE CANDELARIA, CIM-Education, Supervisor, W. VAUGHN, LL&S, State Official, CDCR and others
Defendant: UCC-CIM-ICC, INSTITUTIONAL CLASSIFICATION COMMITTEE, J. ANDRES, DDP-Prison Guard Sgt., VINCENT S. CULLEN, Dir. Correct.Ser.-CDCR and others
Plaintiff / Appellant: MAURICIO JOSE GODOY, AKA Maurice Godoy
(HC) Martinez v. Sherman We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 2:2019cv02477
Petitioner: Salvador Ramon Martinez
Defendant: Stuart Sherman
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. ยง 2254
Lorenzo Martin v. Stuart Sherman
as 19-73149
Petitioner: LORENZO MARTIN
Respondent: STUART SHERMAN, Warden
Percy Camel v. Stuart Sherman
as 19-17338
Respondent / Appellee: STUART SHERMAN, Warden
Petitioner / Appellant: PERCY LAMONTE CAMEL
Cortez Washington v. Stuart Sherman, et al
as 19-56277
Respondent: KAMALA D. HARRIS, Attorney General and RAYMOND MADDEN, Warden
Respondent / Appellee: XAVIER BECERRA and STUART SHERMAN, Warden
Petitioner / Appellant: CORTEZ LAMON WASHINGTON
Thomas Scott v. Stuart Sherman
as 19-17190
Petitioner / Appellant: THOMAS CHARLES SCOTT
Respondent / Appellee: STUART SHERMAN, Warden
Eric Ward v. Stuart Sherman
as 19-72734
Petitioner: ERIC WARD
Respondent: STUART SHERMAN, Warden
Christopher Maes v. Stuart Sherman
as 19-72656
Respondent: STUART SHERMAN, Warden
Petitioner: CHRISTOPHER JOSEPH MAES

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?