Cases 101 - 110 of 200
Lopez v. Armstead et al
as 3:2013cv00294
Defendant:
Sgt. Eric Armstead, Quentin Byrne, Robert LeGrand and others
Plaintiff:
Israel Lopez
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Rose v. LeGrand et al
as 3:2013cv00267
Respondent:
Robert LeGrand and Nevada Attorney General
Petitioner:
Jeff N. Rose
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
McDonald v. Olivas et al
as 3:2013cv00240
Defendant:
Allen, Ball, R. Bannister and others
Plaintiff:
Reginald McDonald
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Means v. LeGrand et al
as 3:2013cv00224
Respondent:
Robert LeGrand and Nevada Attorney General
Petitioner:
Clyde Means
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Stewart v. LeGrand et al
as 3:2013cv00210
Respondent:
Robert LeGrand and Nevada Attorney General
Petitioner:
Demetrious Stewart
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Aviles-Perez v. LeGrand et al
as 3:2013cv00173
Petitioner:
Alejandro Aviles-Perez
Respondent:
Robert LeGrand and Nevada Attorney General
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Dixon v. LeGrande et al
as 3:2013cv00150
Petitioner:
William Robert Dixon
Respondent:
Robert LeGrande and Nevada Attorney General
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Hernandez-Ayala v. LeGrand et al
as 3:2013cv00134
Petitioner:
Joaquin Hernandez-Ayala
Respondent:
Robert LeGrand and Nevada Attorney General
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Dean v. LeGrand et al
as 3:2013cv00112
Petitioner:
Travis Remaul Dean
Respondent:
Robert LeGrand and Nevada Attorney General
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Titus v. LeGrand et al
as 3:2013cv00106
Respondent:
Robert LeGrand and Nevada Attorney General
Petitioner:
Craig M. Titus
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
