Cases 11 - 20 of 3,461
Arthur Sierra v. Walmart Inc. et al
as 2:2024cv03407
Plaintiff:
Arthur Sierra
Defendant:
Walmart Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
Torlucci v. United States District Court for the Central District of California, Los Angeles
as 24-2605
Petitioner:
ARTHUR TORLUCCI
Respondent:
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA, LOS ANGELES
Interested Party:
STATE OF CALIFORNIA and TRENT ALLEN
Dunsing v. Uber Technologies, Inc.
as 3:2024cv00085
Plaintiff:
Arthur Dunsing
Defendant:
Uber Technologies, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2024cv02992
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Notice of Removal
Hundal v. Islas, et al.
as 24-2303
Plaintiff:
GURKIRN HUNDAL
Defendant:
RUBEN ISLAS, JR., MARTHA ISLAS ENRIQUEZ, JOE ZUNIGA and others
Penngrath v. O'Malley
as 3:2024cv02177
Plaintiff:
Arthur Penngrath
Defendant:
Martin J. O'Malley
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (SSID)
Michael D. Arthurs v. Nationstar Mortgage LLC et al
as 2:2024cv02714
Plaintiff:
Michael D. Arthurs
Defendant:
Nationstar Mortgage LLC Company Corporation doing business as Mr. Cooper, Jay Bray, Busy Burr and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Arthur Acevedo v. Punch Press Products, Inc.
as 2:2024cv02690
Plaintiff:
Arthur Acevedo
Defendant:
Punch Press Products, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 33 U.S.C. § 1365 Environmental Matters
Marva King v. Tyler Perry et al
as 2:2024cv02650
Plaintiff:
Ms Marva King
Defendant:
Tyler Perry, Tyler Perry Studios LLC, Arthur Primus and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Contract Dispute
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2024cv02533
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
