Cases filed in the Ninth Circuit Courts
Cases 11 - 20 of 26
Faour Fraihat, et al v. U.S. Immigration and Customs E, et al
as 20-56297
Plaintiff / Appellee: RUBEN DARIO MENCIAS SOTO, ALEX HERNANDEZ, ARISTOTELES SANCHEZ MARTINEZ and others
Defendant / Appellant: CHAD F. WOLF, DAVID P. PEKOSKE, JACKI BECKER KLOPP and others
Al Otro Lado, et al v. Chad Wolf, et al
as 20-56287
Plaintiff / Appellee: VICTORIA DOE, MARIA DOE, JOSE DOE and others
Defendant / Appellant: WILLIAM A. FERRARA, Executive Assistant Commissioner of CBPs Office of Field Operations, MARK A. MORGAN, Acting Commissioner of U.S. Customs and Border Protection and CHAD F. WOLF, Acting Secretary, US Department of Homeland Security
Appellant: EXECUTIVE OFFICE FOR IMMIGRATION REVIEW
J.S.M, et al v. William Barr, et al
as 20-17204
Defendant / Appellee: MATTHEW ALBENCE, Acting Director of Immigration and Customs Enforcement, in his official capacity, L. FRANCIS CISSNA, Acting Director of the U.S. Citizenship and Immigration Services, in his official capacity, WILLIAM P. BARR, Attorney General and others
Plaintiff: CENTRAL AMERICAN RESOURCE CENTER, INNOVATION LAW LAB, EAST BAY SANCTUARY COVENANT and others
Petitioner / Appellant: J. S. M., et al
E.A.R.R et al v. U.S. Department Of Homeland Security (DHS) et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 3:2020cv02146
Plaintiff: L.Y.G., D.G.M., C.J.V.C. and others
Defendant: U.S. Department Of Homeland Security (DHS), U.S. Customs and Border Protection (CBP), Chad Wolf and others
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 0706
Faour Fraihat, et al v. U.S. Immigration and Customs E, et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 20-55634
Plaintiff / Appellee: RUBEN DARIO MENCIAS SOTO, ALEX HERNANDEZ, ARISTOTELES SANCHEZ MARTINEZ and others
Defendant / Appellant: CHAD F. WOLF, DAVID P. PEKOSKE, JACKI BECKER KLOPP and others
Al Otro Lado et al v. Department of Homeland Security et al
as 2:2020cv05191
Plaintiff: Edwin F. Mandel Legal Aid Clinic and Al Otro Lado
Defendant: Immigration and Customs Enforcement, Department of Homeland Security and Customs and Border Protection
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 552
Al Otro Lado, et al v. Chad Wolf, et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 19-56417
Plaintiff / Appellee: VICTORIA DOE, MARIA DOE, JOSE DOE and others
Defendant / Appellant: TODD C. OWEN, Executive Assistant Commissioner, Office of Field Operations, United States Customs and Border Protection, in his official capacity, MARK A. MORGAN, Acting Commissioner of U.S. Customs and Border Protection and CHAD F. WOLF, Acting Secretary, US Department of Homeland Security
East Bay Sanctuary Covenant, et al v. William Barr, et al
as 19-16773
Defendant / Appellant: MATTHEW ALBENCE, Acting Director of Immigration and Customs Enforcement, in his official capacity, JOHN P. SANDERS, Acting Commissioner of U.S. Customs and Border Protection, in his official capacity, U.S. DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND SECURITY and others
Plaintiff / Appellee: CENTRAL AMERICAN RESOURCE CENTER, INNOVATION LAW LAB, EAST BAY SANCTUARY COVENANT and others
Amicus Curiae: FORMER NATIONAL SECURITY OFFICALS, NON-PROFIT ORGANIZATIONS, KIDS IN NEED OF DEFENSE and others
Plaintiff v. Defendant We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 5:2019cv01546
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 794
East Bay Sanctuary Covenant, et al v. William Barr, et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 19-16487
Defendant / Appellant: MATTHEW ALBENCE, Acting Director of Immigration and Customs Enforcement, in his official capacity, JOHN P. SANDERS, Acting Commissioner of U.S. Customs and Border Protection, in his official capacity, U.S. DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND SECURITY and others
Plaintiff / Appellee: CENTRAL AMERICAN RESOURCE CENTER, INNOVATION LAW LAB, EAST BAY SANCTUARY COVENANT and others
Amicus Curiae: PROFESSORS OF IMMIGRATION LAW, STATE OF ARIZONA and IMMIGRATION REFORM LAW INSTITUTE

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?