Cases 11 - 20 of 134
Andre Lamarr Jackson v. Director of Corrections of The State of California et al
as 2:2012cv05743
Defendant:
Edward Alameida, Jr, Edward Alameida, Jr, R. Burts and others
Plaintiff:
Andre Lamarr Jackson
George Hamilton v. David Tristan, et al
as 12-15501
Plaintiff - Appellant:
GEORGE HAMILTON
Defendant - Appellee:
DAVID TRISTAN, Former Chief Deputy Director, EDWARD ALAMEIDA, THOMAS MOORE, Former Assistant Director and others
Julian De Medeiros v. James Yates, et al
as 12-15175
Plaintiff - Appellant:
JULIAN GAGO DE MEDEIROS
Defendant - Appellee:
JAMES A. YATES, PLEASANT VALLEY STATE PRISON, GAIL LEWIS and others
Fernando Guizar v. Jeanne Woodford, et al
as 12-15001
Plaintiff - Appellant:
FERNANDO GUIZAR
Defendant - Appellee:
JEANNE S. WOODFORD, E. ALAMEIDA, Jr., G. HARRIS and others
-AJW Derek Barboza v. D. M. Kelsey
as 2:2003cv03855
Defendant:
Edward S Alameida, Jr, L C Bowen, C Collins and others
Plaintiff:
Derek Barboza
Unknown:
Gerald S Ohn, Gerald S Ohn, Gerald S Ohn and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Gary Carrillo v. Edward Alameida, Jr.
as 11-73246
Petitioner:
GARY THOMAS CARRILLO
Respondent:
EDWARD S. ALAMEIDA, Jr.
Vance Johnson v. D. Runnels, et al
as 11-17310
Plaintiff - Appellant:
VANCE EDWARD JOHNSON
Defendant - Appellee:
D. L. RUNNELS, Warden, J.M. BRIDDLE, R. GOWER and others
Randall Amado v. Edward Alameida, Jr.
as 11-56420
Petitioner - Appellant:
RANDALL AMADO
Respondent - Appellee:
EDWARD S. ALAMEIDA, Jr., Director, California Department of Corrections
Bryan Ransom v. D. Ortiz, et al
as 11-16970
Plaintiff - Appellant:
BRYAN EDWIN RANSOM
Defendant - Appellee:
D. ORTIZ, A. CANTON, P. FLORES and others
Randall Amado v. Edward S Alameida
as 2:2003cv00078
Respondent:
Edward S Alameida, Jr
Petitioner:
Randall Amado
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
