Cases 11 - 19 of 19
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2013cv05717
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Carballo v. Comcast, Inc. et al
as 3:2013cv05572
Plaintiff:
Nelson Carballo
Defendant:
Comcast, Inc. , Communication Workers of America and The American Federation of Labor-Congress of Industrial Organizations, CLC
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 185
Carballo v. Comcast Inc. et al
as 3:2013cv05536
Plaintiff:
Nelson Carballo
Defendant:
Comcast Inc., Comcast Cable Communications Management LLC, COMCAST CABLE COMMUNICATIONS LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 185 Labor/Mgt. Relations (Contracts)
Daniel Keating-Traynor v. AC Square, et al
as 11-16822
Plaintiff - Appellee:
DANIEL KEATING-TRAYNOR, on behalf of himself and all others similarly situated
Defendant - Appellant:
AC SQUARE, AFSHIN GHANEH and ANDREW BAHMANYAR
Defendant:
COMCAST INC.
Daniel Keating-Traynor v. AC Square, et al
as 11-16806
Plaintiff - Appellee:
DANIEL KEATING-TRAYNOR, on behalf of himself and all others similarly situated
Defendant - Appellant:
AC SQUARE, ANDREW BAHMANYAR and AFSHIN GHANEH
Defendant:
COMCAST INC.
Ramos v. AC Square et al
as 3:2008cv05177
Plaintiff:
Thomas W. Ramos
Defendant:
AC Square, Comcast Inc., Afshin Ghaneh and others
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Daniel Keating-Traynor v. AC Square, et al
as 08-17069
Plaintiff - Appellant:
DANIEL KEATING-TRAYNOR, on behalf of himself and all others similarly situated
Defendant - Appellee:
AC SQUARE, COMCAST INC., AFSHIN GHANEH and others
Keating-Traynor v. AC Square, Inc. et al
as 3:2008cv03035
Plaintiff:
Daniel Keating-Traynor
Defendant:
AC Square, Inc., AC Square, Inc., AC Square, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Keating-Traynor v. AC Square et al
as 3:2008cv02907
Plaintiff:
Daniel Keating-Traynor
Defendant:
AC Square, Comcast Inc., Afshin Ghaneh and others
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.