Cases 11 - 20 of 21
Rodrigues v. County of Hawaii et al
as 1:2018cv00027
Defendant:
Samuel Jelsma, Roe Governmental Entities 1-10, County of Hawaii and others
Plaintiff:
John Rodrigues, Jr.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2017cv00459
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 451
Gomes v. County of Hawaii et al
as 1:2017cv00374
Defendant:
Roe "Non Profit" Corporations 1-10, County of Hawaii, Department of Public Works, Highways Division and others
Plaintiff:
Robert G. Gomes, Jr.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Campbell v. Department of Human Services
as 1:2017cv00138
Plaintiff:
Christopher Campbell
Defendant:
Department of Human Services, State of Hawaii , Doe Persons 1-10, Doe Partnerships 1-10 and others
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 754
Kyser v. Kalani Honua, Inc.
as 1:2016cv00482
Plaintiff:
Georgette L. Kyser
Defendant:
Kalani Honua, Inc., Doe Persons 1-10, Doe Partnerships 1-10 and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2014cv00395
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2013cv00223
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Employment Discrimination
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2013cv00201
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101 Violation of Americans with Disabilities Act
Abad v. Fairmont Orchid, Hawaii, The et al
as 1:2012cv00333
Plaintiff:
Benjamin Abad
Defendant:
Fairmont Orchid, Hawaii, The , Doe Persons 1-10, DOE Partnerships 1-10 and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Harvey et al v. Ross Dress For Less, Inc. et al
as 1:2010cv00612
Plaintiff:
Radha Harvey and Michael Harvey
Defendant:
Ross Dress For Less, Inc. , Doe Persons 1-10, Doe Partnerships 1-20 and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
