Cases 11 - 20 of 20
Gravity Defyer Corporation v. Under Armour Inc et al
as 2:2013cv01842
Defendant:
Amazon.com Inc, BackCountry.Com, Inc., Champs Sports Inc and others
Plaintiff:
Gravity Defyer Corporation
Crystal Antonelli, et al v. The Finish Line, Inc., et al
as 12-15512
Plaintiff - Appellee:
CRYSTAL ANTONELLI, ANNY CHI, ALISHA ELAM and others
Defendant - Appellant:
THE FINISH LINE, INC.
Defendant:
DAVID MEYER
Antonelli et al v. Finish Line, Inc et al
as 5:2011cv03874
Plaintiff:
Crystal Antonelli , Anny Chi , Alisha Elam and others
Defendant:
Finish Line, Inc and David Meyer
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2010cv01557
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: Americans with Disabilities Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2009cv01581
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: Americans with Disabilities Act
ELVH, Inc. v. Nike, Inc.
as 2:2009cv04219
Plaintiff:
ELVH, Inc., ELVH, Inc. and ELVH, Inc.
Defendant:
Nike, Inc. and The Finish Line, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 17 U.S.C. § 101 Copyright Infringement
Kris Daniels v. Finish Line, Inc.
as 09-15313
Plaintiff - Appellant:
KRIS DANIELS, on behalf of himself and all others similarly situated
Defendant - Appellee:
FINISH LINE, INC.
Daniels v. Finish Line, Inc.
as 2:2007cv01501
Plaintiff:
Kris Daniels
Defendant:
Finish Line, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 206 Collect Unpaid Wages
Daniels v. Finish Line, Inc.
as 2:2007at00681
Plaintiff:
Kris Daniels
Defendant:
Finish Line, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 206 Collect Unpaid Wages
Park v. The Finish Line Inc et al
as 3:2007cv01093
Plaintiff:
Hyun Park
Defendant:
The Finish Line Inc and DOES
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Labor/Mgmnt. Relations
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
