Cases 11 - 20 of 52
Kesling v. Tewalt, et al
as 1:2019cv00178
Defendant:
Henry Atencio, Stephanie Trobock, Noel Barlow-Hust and others
Plaintiff:
Shawn M Kesling
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Adree Edmo v. Corizon, Inc., et al
as 19-35017
Defendant:
HOWARD KEITH YORDY, RICHARD CRAIG, JEFF ZUMDA and others
Defendant / Appellant:
MURRAY YOUNG, CORIZON, INC., SCOTT ELIASON and others
Undetermined:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Plaintiff / Appellee:
ADREE EDMO, AKA Mason Edmo
Adree Edmo v. Idaho Department of Correction, et al
as 19-35019
Defendant:
CATHERINE WHINNERY, CORIZON, INC., SCOTT ELIASON and others
Defendant / Appellant:
JEFF ZUMDA, HENRY ATENCIO, RONA SIEGERT and others
Undetermined:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Plaintiff / Appellee:
ADREE EDMO, AKA Mason Edmo
Kesling v. Atencio
as 1:2018cv00568
Plaintiff:
Shawn M Kesling
Defendant:
Henry Atencio
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
McGiboney v. Corizon et al
as 1:2018cv00529
Plaintiff:
Joshua McGiboney
Defendant:
Ron Sutherlin, Rebbekka Haggard, Board of Corrections and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Halbert v. Field et al
as 1:2018cv00470
Defendant:
Cindy Wilson, Debbie Field, Aaron Hofer and others
Plaintiff:
Larry Halbert
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Dana v. Atencio et al
as 1:2018cv00298
Defendant:
D W McKay, J Schneider, G Roberts and others
Plaintiff:
Larry Dana
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Geib v. Atencio et al
as 1:2018cv00284
Plaintiff:
Robert A Geib
Defendant:
Henry Atencio, Yordy, Valley and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Wolf v. Idaho State Board of Correction et al
as 1:2018cv00264
Plaintiff:
Andrew J.J. Wolf
Defendant:
Idaho State Board of Correction, Debra Field, David McCluskey and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Meadows v. Atencio et al
as 1:2018cv00265
Plaintiff:
Daisy Meadows
Defendant:
Henry Atencio, Rona Siegert, Howard Yordy and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
