Cases 11 - 20 of 34
Gavin Newsom, et al v. USDC-SAC
as 19-71493
Petitioner:
PAMELA AHLIN, Director of the Department of State Hospitals, DIANA TOCHE, Undersecretary for Health Care Services of the CDCR, KATHERINE TEBROCK, Deputy Director of the Statewide Mental Heath Program and others
Not Classified By Court:
In re: GAVIN NEWSOM, KATHERINE TEBROCK, Deputy Director of the Statewide Mental Health Program and MICHAEL COHEN, Director of the Department of Finance for the State of California
Not Yet Classified:
RALPH COLEMAN and MATTHEW A. LOPES, Jr.
Respondent:
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA, SACRAMENTO
Ralph Coleman, et al v. Gavin Newsom, et al
as 19-15006
Plaintiff / Appellee:
WINIFRED WILLIAMS, JOSEPH ROY, RALPH COLEMAN and others
Defendant / Appellant:
MICHAEL COHEN, Director of the Department of Finance, PAMELA AHLIN, Director of the Department of State Hospitals, SCOTT KERNAN, Secretary of the California Department of Corrections and Rehabilitation and others
Ralph Coleman, et al v. Edmund Brown, Jr., et al
as 18-16445
Plaintiff - Appellee:
RALPH COLEMAN, WINIFRED WILLIAMS, DAVID J HEROUX and others
Defendant - Appellant:
EDMUND G. BROWN, Jr., Governor of the State of California, SCOTT KERNAN, Secretary of the California Department of Corrections and Rehabilitation, MICHAEL COHEN, Director of the Department of Finance and others
Ralph Coleman, et al v. Edmund Brown, Jr., et al
as 17-17328
Plaintiff - Appellee:
RALPH COLEMAN, WINIFRED WILLIAMS, DAVID J HEROUX and others
Defendant - Appellant:
EDMUND G. BROWN, Jr., Governor of the State of California, SCOTT KERNAN, Secretary of the California Department of Corrections and Rehabilitation, MICHAEL COHEN, Director of the Department of Finance and others
Ralph Coleman, et al v. Edmund Brown, Jr., et al
as 17-17328
Plaintiff / Appellee:
RALPH COLEMAN, WINIFRED WILLIAMS, DAVID J HEROUX and others
Defendant / Appellant:
EDMUND G. BROWN, Jr., Governor of the State of California, SCOTT KERNAN, Secretary of the California Department of Corrections and Rehabilitation, MICHAEL COHEN, Director of the Department of Finance and others
Ralph Coleman, et al v. Edmund Brown, Jr., et al
as 17-16080
Plaintiff - Appellee:
RALPH COLEMAN, WINIFRED WILLIAMS, DAVID J HEROUX and others
Defendant - Appellant:
EDMUND G. BROWN, Jr., Governor of the State of California, SCOTT KERNAN, Secretary of the California Department of Corrections and Rehabilitation, MICHAEL COHEN, Director of the Department of Finance and others
Ralph Coleman, et al v. Edmund Brown, Jr., et al
as 14-16691
Plaintiff - Appellee:
RALPH COLEMAN, WINIFRED WILLIAMS, DAVID J HEROUX and others
Defendant - Appellant:
EDMUND G. BROWN, Jr., Governor of the State of California, JEFFREY A. BEARD, Dr., Secretary of the California Department of Corrections and Rehabilitation, ANA J. MATOSANTOS, Director of the Department of Finance and others
Los Angeles Times Communicatio v. USDC-SAC
as 13-73467
:
In re: LOS ANGELES TIMES COMMUNICATIONS LLC
Petitioner:
LOS ANGELES TIMES COMMUNICATIONS LLC
Respondent:
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA, SACRAMENTO
Real Party In Interest:
RALPH COLEMAN, et al. and EDMUND G. BROWN, Jr., et al.
Ralph Coleman, et al v. Edmund Brown, Jr., et al
as 13-16637
Plaintiff - Appellee:
RALPH COLEMAN, WINIFRED WILLIAMS, DAVID J HEROUX and others
Defendant - Appellant:
EDMUND G. BROWN, Jr., Governor of the State of California, JEFFREY A. BEARD, Dr., Secretary of the California Department of Corrections and Rehabilitation, ANA J. MATOSANTOS, Director of the Department of Finance and others
Ralph Coleman, et al v. Edmund Brown, Jr., et al
as 13-15931
Plaintiff - Appellee:
RALPH COLEMAN, WINIFRED WILLIAMS, DAVID J HEROUX and others
Defendant - Appellant:
EDMUND G. BROWN, Jr., Governor of the State of California, JEFFREY BEARD, Dr., Secretary of the California Department of Corrections and Rehabilitation, ANA J. MATOSANTOS, Director of the Department of Finance and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
