Cases 11 - 20 of 28
Michael E. Berry v. Equifax Inc., et al
as 8:2018cv00957
Plaintiff:
Michael E. Berry, Johnny James Deleon, Nicholas Edward Dibs and others
Defendant:
Does and Equifax Inc.
Robert Macia Wilson v. Nancy A. Berryhill
as 2:2017cv05880
Defendant:
Nancy A. Berryhill
Plaintiff:
Robert Macias Wilson
Securities and Exchange Commission v. Cash Capital, LLC et al
as 3:2017cv01536
Plaintiff:
Securities and Exchange Commission
Defendant:
Cash Capital, LLC, America's Strategic Ore Properties, LLC and Robert W. Wilson
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 0077
Gloria Herrera et al v. AstraZeneca Pharmaceuticals LP et al
as 2:2014cv04134
Plaintiff:
Aaron Ardoin, Ramona Bodden, Joan Byerley and others
Defendant:
AstraZeneca LP, AstraZeneca Pharmaceuticals LP, Does and others
Wilson v. California Department of Corrections and Rehabilitation, et al.
as 2:2014cv00721
Plaintiff:
Robert L. Wilson, II
Defendant:
California Department of Corrections and Rehabilitation, North Kern State Prison and Sandra Pennywell
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Wilson et al v. Biomet Orthopedics, LLC et al
as 3:2012cv03368
Plaintiff:
Terri L. Wilson and Robert R. Wilson
Defendant:
Biomet Orthopedics, LLC , Biomet, Inc. and Biomet, LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Broadcast Music Inc et al v. Ciscos Westlake Village Corp et al
as 2:2012cv04046
Plaintiff:
BMG Platinum Songs US, Broadcast Music Inc, Cahron Childs and others
Defendant:
Ciscos Westlake Village Corp and Robert Larry Wilson
Hess v. Madera Honda Suzuki, a California corporation et al
as 1:2010at00765
Plaintiff:
Edna - Hess
Defendant:
Madera Honda Suzuki, a California corporation, Harry D. Wilson, Inc., a California corporation and Robert D. Wilson
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201
Hess v. Madera Honda Suzuki, a California corporation et al
as 1:2010cv01821
Plaintiff:
Edna Hess
Defendant:
Madera Honda Suzuki, Harry D. Wilson, Inc. and Robert D. Wilson
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
