Cases 11 - 18 of 18
Robert Dennis Frye v. Vincent S. Cullen
as 2:2010cv01869
Respondent:
Vincent S. Cullen
Petitioner:
Robert Dennis Frye
USA v. Robert Pryce
as 08-56989
Plaintiff - Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant - Appellant:
ROBERT DENNIS PRYCE, AKA Seal A
USA v. Robert Pryce
as 08-56771
Plaintiff - Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant - Appellant:
ROBERT DENNIS PRYCE, aka Seal B
Robert Pryce v. USDC-CAC
as 08-74481
:
In re: ROBERT DENNIS PRYCE
Petitioner:
ROBERT DENNIS PRYCE
Respondent:
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA, LOS ANGELES
Real Party In Interest:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Robert Pryce v. USDC-CAC
as 08-74194
:
In re: ROBERT DENNIS PRYCE
Petitioner:
ROBERT DENNIS PRYCE
Respondent:
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA, LOS ANGELES
Real Party In Interest:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
The Board of Trustees, in their Capacities as Trustees of the Laborers Health and Welfare Trust Fund for Northern California et al v. Baca et al
as 3:2008cv03813
Plaintiff:
The Board of Trustees, in their Capacities as Trustees of the Laborers Health and Welfare Trust Fund for Northern California, The Board of Trustees, in their Capacities as Trustees of the Laborers Health and Welfare Trust Fund for Northern California, The Board of Trustees, in their Capacities as Trustees of the Laborers Health and Welfare Trust Fund for Northern California and others
Defendant:
Robert Dennis Baca, Robert Dennis Baca and Baca & Sons
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Pryce v. USA
as 2:2008cv04456
Respondent:
USA
Petitioner:
Robert Dennis Pryce
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. ยง 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentence
Wells v. Butte County Jail et al
as 2:2008cv00514
Plaintiff:
Robert Dennis Wells
Defendant:
Butte County Jail, Perry Reniff, Bill Conelly and others
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
