Cases 11 - 20 of 93
Ruben Herrera v. Secretary of Corrections, et al
as 21-55314
Respondent / Appellee:
KATHLEEN ALLISON, Warden, Secretary of CDCR, CALIFORNIA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS AND REHABILITATION and SECRETARY OF CORRECTIONS
Petitioner / Appellant:
RUBEN MORENO HERRERA
(PC) Walker v. Secretary of Corrections, et al
as 2:2021cv00364
Defendant:
M. Cole, Secretary of Corrections, E. Takehara and others
Plaintiff:
G. Daniel Walker
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Ruben Herrera v. Secretary of Corrections et al
as 5:2021cv00329
Respondent:
Secretary of CDCR Kathleen Allison, Secretary of Corrections and CDCR of CA
Petitioner:
Ruben Herrera
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Rudolph Ellis, Jr. v. Ralph Diaz
as 21-15265
Defendant / Appellee:
RALPH DIAZ, Secretary of Corrections
Plaintiff / Appellant:
RUDOLPH ELLIS, Jr.
Gerardo Ortiz v. Secretary of Corrections
as 20-56359
Petitioner / Appellant:
GERARDO ORTIZ
Respondent / Appellee:
SECRETARY OF CORRECTIONS, CDCR
(PC) Walker v. Gates et al
as 2:2020cv02338
Defendant:
Warden, Salinas Valley State Prison, N. Malakkla, A Abdulbasel and others
Plaintiff:
G. Daniel Walker
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Kikongo Hakim-Akbar Jones v. CA Mens Colony et al
as 2:2020cv08704
Plaintiff:
Kikongo Hakim-Akbar Jones and F. Jones
Defendant:
Brian A. Dodd, CA Secretary of Corrections and CA Mens Colony
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Nuzzio Begaren v. Secretary of Corrections
as 20-55949
Respondent / Appellee:
SECRETARY OF CORRECTIONS, (CDCR)
Petitioner / Appellant:
NUZZIO BEGAREN
Ramon Contreras v. Ralph Diaz, et al
as 20-55710
Defendant / Appellee:
C. ROCHA, Correctional Officer, V. CORTES, Correctional Officer, PATRICK COVELLO and others
Defendant:
M. SEAMAN, PLASCENCIA and H. CRUZ
Plaintiff / Appellant:
RAMON IVAN CONTRERAS
Johnson v. Secretary of Corrections
as 3:2020cv04298
Petitioner:
Eric E. Johnson
Respondent:
Secretary of Corrections
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
