Cases filed in the Ninth Circuit Courts
Cases 11 - 20 of 102
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2023cv03065
Petitioner: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 08 U.S.C. ยง 1329 Writ of Mandamus to Adjudicate Visa Petition
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2023cv02950
Petitioner: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. ยง 1361 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 23-55170
Plaintiff / Appellee: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant / Appellant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 22-16520
Plaintiff / Appellant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant / Appellee: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Type: Civil Rights Jobs
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 22-15898
Plaintiff / Appellee: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant / Appellant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 22-55430
Petitioner: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent / Appellee: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Petitioner / Appellant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 22-35248
Plaintiff / Appellant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant / Appellee: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Veenaben Patel, et al v. William Barr, et al
as 21-17024
Petitioner / Appellant: VEENABEN DHIRUBHAI PATEL and AJAY RAMABHAI PATEL
Respondent / Appellee: WILLIAM P. BARR, Attorney General, Former U.S. Attorney General, CHAD F. WOLF, Secretary, U.S. Department of Homeland Security, THOMAS HOMAN, Director, U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement and others
Haisam Elsharkawi v. USA, et al
as 21-56206
Plaintiff / Appellant: HAISAM ELSHARKAWI
Defendant / Appellee: UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, ALEJANDRO N. MAYORKAS, Secretary of Department of Homeland Security, in his official capacity and TROY A. MILLER, Acting Commissioner of Customs and Border Protection
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 21-56128
Petitioner: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent: Plaintiff v. Defendant

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?