Cases 11 - 20 of 42
Dustin Faust et al v. FCA US LLC et al
as 2:2019cv04231
Plaintiff:
John Marshall, Gregory S. Brown, Ashley Cryer and others
Defendant:
FCA US LLC and Does 1 through 10, inclusive
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
(PC) Smith v. Pfeiffer, et al.
as 1:2019cv00437
Defendant:
S.K. Hemenway, Trotter, J. Bermudez and others
Plaintiff:
Jarmaal Smith
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
David Wilson v. California State Prison Corcor, et al
as 19-15237
Defendant / Appellee:
PATTEN, Supervising Correctional Cook I, D. OVERLEY, ADA Coordinator, R. TOLSON, Associate Warden Housing and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
DAVID WAYNE WILSON
(PC) Gil v. Perez et al
as 1:2018cv01039
Defendant:
Munoz, A. Johnson, Oliveira and others
Plaintiff:
Ruben Gil
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
(PC) Madrid v. Allison et al
as 1:2018cv00947
Defendant:
J. Soa, R. Valdez, A. De La Cruz and others
Plaintiff:
David Joseph Madrid
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Wilson v. California State Prison Corcoran et al
as 1:2018cv00424
Plaintiff:
David W. Wilson
Defendant:
California State Prison Corcoran, California Department of Corrections and Rehabilitation, A. Biter and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Garland Jones v. Tolson, et al
as 17-17060
Plaintiff - Appellant:
GARLAND A. JONES
Defendant - Appellee:
TOLSON, DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS and MULE CREEK STATE PRISON
Villalobos v. Faulkner, et al.
as 1:2017cv01109
Plaintiff:
Ricardo Villalobos, Jr.
Defendant:
Maria Faulkner, Brian Snider, Joy Woodard and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Stipp v. Brown, et al
as 1:2017cv01074
Plaintiff:
Raymond Stipp
Defendant:
Edmond G. Brown, Jr., R Tolson, D. Stibbins and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Raymond Stipp v. Edmond G. Brown Jr. et al
as 2:2017cv05100
Defendant:
Governor Edmond G. Brown, Jr., Associate Warden D. Stibbins, R. Tolson and others
Plaintiff:
Raymond Stipp
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
