Cases 21 - 25 of 25
In re NCAA Student-Athlete Name Likeness Licensing Litigation
as 4:2011mc80300
Plaintiff:
In re NCAA Student-Athlete Name Likeness Licensing Litigation
Intervenor:
Big Ten Network and Big Ten Conference, Inc.
Cause Of Action: Civil Miscellaneous Case
Type:
Other Statutes
In re NCAA Student-Athlete Name Likeness Licensing Litigation
as 3:2011mc80300
Plaintiff:
In re NCAA Student-Athlete Name Likeness Licensing Litigation
Intervenor:
Big Ten Network and Big Ten Conference, Inc.
Cause Of Action: Civil Miscellaneous Case
Type:
Other Statutes
In re NCAA Student-Athlete Name Likeness Licensing Litigation
as 4:2011mc80300
Respondent:
Big Ten Conference, Inc. and Big Ten Network
Plaintiff:
Edward C. O'Bannon, Jr.
Amicu:
The SouthEastern Conference
Cause Of Action: Civil Miscellaneous Case
Type:
Other Statutes
Maze et al v. National Collegiate Athletic Association et al
as 3:2010cv05569
Plaintiff:
Bobby C. Maze and Jordan Dixon
Defendant:
National Collegiate Athletic Association, Collegiate Licensing Company, Electronic Arts, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1
Keller v. Electronic Arts Inc. et al
as 4:2009cv01967
Not Classified By Court:
SEC, Non-Party XOS Technologies, Inc., The Big Ten Conference, Inc. and others
Consolidated Plaintiff:
Samuel Jacobson, Danny Wimprine, Craig Newsome and others
Interested Party:
Timothy J McIlwain, Pac-12 Conference, James E. Delany and others
Amicus Curiae:
A&E Television Networks, LLC, James Brown, First Amendment Coalition and others
Plaintiff:
Michael E. Davis, Michael Anderson, Samuel Michael Keller and others
Intervenor:
Ramzi Yusef, Edward Breivik, James E. Holmes and others
Petitioner:
Nicholas Kindler
Defendant:
Collegiate Licensing Company, National Collegiate Athletic Association and Electronic Arts Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Other Contract
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.