Cases 21 - 30 of 33
Edwin Childs v. CRST Expedited, Inc. et al
as 5:2018cv00436
Defendant:
CRST Expedited, Inc. and Does
Plaintiff:
Edwin Childs
Edwin Childs v. CRST Expedited, Inc. et al
as 2:2018cv01729
Defendant:
CRST Expedited, Inc. and Does
Plaintiff:
Edwin Childs
Dueker v. CRST Expedited, Inc. et al
as 1:2018at00116
Plaintiff:
Christopher Dueker
Defendant:
CRST Expedited, Inc. and Does 1 through 50, inclusive
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Dueker v. CRST Expedited, Inc. et al
![Final or Interim Order We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case](/bundles/docketsbrowsing/images/gavel.png)
as 2:2018cv00381
Plaintiff:
Christopher Dueker
Defendant:
CRST Expedited, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Curtis Markson et al v. CRST International, Inc. et al
![Final or Interim Order We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case](/bundles/docketsbrowsing/images/gavel.png)
as 5:2017cv01261
Plaintiff:
Curtis Markson, Mark McGeorge, Eric Clark and others
Defendant:
CRST International, Inc., CRST Expedited, Inc. doing business as CRST The Transportation Solution Inc, Does 1-100, inclusive and others
Interested Party:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Notice of Removal - Labor/Mgmnt. Relations
Curtis Markson et al v. CRST International, Inc. et al
as 2:2017cv04620
Defendant:
DOES 1-100, inclusive,, CRST Expedited, Inc., CRST International, Inc. and others
Plaintiff:
Mark McGeorge and Curtis Markson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Petition for Removal
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2016cv03837
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2015cv00969
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2015cv01103
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2015cv00283
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.