Cases 21 - 30 of 37
Lonnie Williams, Jr. v. K. Higgins, et al
as 12-17493
Plaintiff - Appellant:
LONNIE CLARK WILLIAMS, Jr.
Defendant - Appellee:
K. HIGGINS, J. HARRIS and M. MURRAY
Lonnie Williams, Jr. v. CDCR
as 12-17477
Plaintiff - Appellant:
LONNIE CLARK WILLIAMS, Jr.
Defendant - Appellee:
CALIFORNIA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS AND REHABILITATION
Lonnie Williams, Jr. v. James Wedell, et al
as 12-17454
Plaintiff - Appellant:
LONNIE CLARK WILLIAMS, Jr.
Defendant - Appellee:
JAMES WEDELL, MIRANDA, SWEET and others
Lonnie Williams, Jr. v. P. Rodriguez, et al
as 12-17153
Plaintiff - Appellant:
LONNIE CLARK WILLIAMS, Jr.
Defendant - Appellee:
P. RODRIGUEZ, Correctional Officer, DARRELL ADAMS, Executive Warden, BERRY, Sergeant for Los Angeles County Sheriff's Department and others
Lonnie Williams, Jr. v. D. Bauer, et al
as 12-72960
Petitioner:
LONNIE CLARK WILLIAMS, Jr.
Respondent:
D. BAUER, M. ROBERTS, S. LEATHERMAN and others
Williams v. Bauer et al
as 2:2012cv02158
Plaintiff:
Lonnie Clark Williams, Jr.
Defendant:
D Bauer, M. Sharp, M. Roberts and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Williams v. Brennan, et al
as 2:2012cv02155
Plaintiff:
Lonnie Clark Williams, Jr.
Defendant:
Edmund F. Brennan, Dale A. Drozd, M. Plummer and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Lonnie Williams, Jr. v. K. Higgins, et al
as 12-16545
Plaintiff - Appellant:
LONNIE CLARK WILLIAMS, Jr.
Defendant - Appellee:
K. HIGGINS, J. HARRIS and M. MURRAY
Lonnie Williams, Jr. v. P. Rodriguez, et al
as 12-16431
Plaintiff - Appellant:
LONNIE CLARK WILLIAMS, Jr.
Defendant - Appellee:
P. RODRIGUEZ, Correctional Officer, DARRELL ADAMS, Executive Warden, BERRY, Sergeant for Los Angeles County Sheriff's Department and others
Williams v. California Department of Corrections and Rehabilition
as 2:2012cv01616
Plaintiff:
Lonnie Clark Williams, Jr.
Defendant:
California Department of Corrections and Rehabilition
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
