Cases 21 - 30 of 784
Smith, et al. v. Tumalo Irrigation District, et al.
as 24-70
Plaintiff / Appellant:
MATTHEW JAMES SMITH, PAUL CALLEN, KATHY POWELL and others
Defendant / Appellee:
TUMALO IRRIGATION DISTRICT, RONALD ALVARADO, in his official capacity as State Conservationist, Natural Resources Conservation Service, United States Department of Agriculture and NATURAL RESOURCES CONSERVATION SERVICE, a federal agency of the United States Department of Agriculture
Central Oregon Wild Horse Coalition, et al. v. Vilsack, et al.
as 23-4260
Plaintiff / Appellant:
CENTRAL OREGON WILD HORSE COALITION, a non-profit organization, GAYLE HUNT, an individual and MELINDA KESTLER, an individual
Defendant / Appellee:
TOM VILSACK, in his official capacity as Secretary of the U.S. Department of Agriculture, RANDY MOORE, Chief of the U.S. Forest Service, in his official capacity, GLENN CASAMASSA, Regional Forester, Pacific Northwest Region of the U.S. Forest Service, in his official capacity and others
Pratum Farm, LLC v. United States Department of Agriculture
as 6:2023cv01525
Plaintiff:
Pratum Farm, LLC
Defendant:
United States Department of Agriculture
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 702 Administrative Procedure Act
Western Watersheds Project, et al. v. Perdue, et al.
as 23-3872
Plaintiff / Appellant:
WESTERN WATERSHEDS PROJECT, a non-profit organization and WILDERNESS WATCH, a non-profit organization
Defendant / Appellee:
SONNY PERDUE, as Secretary of the United States Department of Agriculture, UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE, a federal department, UNITED STATES FOREST SERVICE, a federal agency and others
Joyce Burrus v. USDA, et al
as 23-16203
Plaintiff / Appellant:
JOYCE M. BURRUS
Defendant / Appellee:
UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE, UNITED STATES FOREST SERVICE, VICTORIA CHRISTIANSEN, Chief and others
WildEarth Guardians, et al. v. United States Department of Agriculture Animal and Plant Health Inspection Service Wildlife Services, et al.
as 23-2944
Plaintiff / Appellant:
WILDEARTH GUARDIANS and WESTERN WATERSHEDS PROJECT
Defendant / Appellee:
UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE ANIMAL AND PLANT HEALTH INSPECTION SERVICE WILDLIFE SERVICES, UNITED STATES FOREST SERVICE and UNITED STATES BUREAU OF LAND MANAGEMENT
Natural Grocers, et al v. Thomas Vilsack, et al
as 22-16770
Plaintiff / Appellant:
NATURAL GROCERS, CITIZENS FOR GMO LABELING, LABEL GMOS and others
Defendant / Appellee:
THOMAS VILSACK, Secretary of the United States Department of Agriculture, BRUCE SUMMERS, Administrator of the Agricultural Marketing Services and UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE
Intervenor Defendant / Appellee:
AMERICAN FARM BUREAU FEDERATION, UNITED STATES BEET SUGAR ASSOCIATION and AMERICAN SUGARBEET GROWERS ASSOCIATION
Amicus Curiae:
NON-GMO PROJECT and HEALTH RESEARCH INSTITUTE
Los Padres Forestwatch, et al v. USFS, et al
as 23-55801
Plaintiff / Appellant:
LOS PADRES FORESTWATCH, KEEP SESPE WILD COMMITTEE, EARTH ISLAND INSTITUTE and others
Plaintiff:
CITY OF OJAI and COUNTY OF VENTURA
Defendant / Appellee:
UNITED STATES FOREST SERVICE, KARINA MEDINA, District Ranger, United States Forest Service, TOM VILSACK, Secretary of Agriculture, United States Department of Agriculture and others
Raul Perez, et al v. USDA, et al
as 23-16139
Plaintiff / Appellant:
RAUL R. PEREZ, individually and as the Successor in Interest to the Estate of A.P., BRITTANY L. PEREZ, N. R. P., a minor by and through his guardian ad litem Brittany L. Perez and others
Defendant / Appellee:
UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE, UNITED STATES FOREST SERVICE and UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Diaz et al v. Rubicon Foundation et al
as 2:2023cv01308
Plaintiff:
Victor Diaz and Ellen Diaz
Defendant:
Rubicon Foundation, Clifford Croney and United States Department of Agriculture Natural Resources Conservation Service
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1442 Petition for Removal
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
