Cases filed in the Ninth Circuit Courts
Cases 21 - 30 of 94
Marlow Yachts Limited Inc
as 2:2010cv00757
Plaintiff: Marlow Yachts Limited Inc
Defendant: STORMY LINN HAYES
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Type: Contract Marine
Klein v. No Limit, Inc.
as 1:2009cv00589
Plaintiff: R. Wayne Klein and R. Wayne Klein
Defendant: No Limit, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Securities & Exchange Commission Act
Type: Other Statutes None
Hayes v. Marlow Yachts Limited Inc
as 2:2009cv00314
Plaintiff: Daniel M Hayes
Defendant: Marlow Yachts Limited Inc, Marlow Yachts Limited Inc and Marlow Yachts Limited Inc
Cause Of Action: Diversity
Type: Contract None
Louie et al v. Exxon Mobil Corporation
as 2:2009cv00048
Plaintiff: Rose Louie, Rose Louie, Louie's Limited Inc and others
Defendant: Exxon Mobil Corporation, Exxon Mobil Corporation and Exxon Mobil Corporation
Cause Of Action: Diversity
Type: Real Property None
First Financial Insurance v. Scotch 80's Limited, Inc. et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 2:2008cv00862
Plaintiff: First Financial Insurance Company
Defendant: Scotch 80's Limited, Inc., Johnny Thomas Williams and Nevada West Business Insurance Agency
Cause Of Action: Diversity
Type: Contract None
IMCA, Inc. v. AU Optronics Corp. et al
as 3:2007cv05348
Plaintiff: IMCA, Inc.
Defendant: AU Optronics Corp., AU Optronics Corp. America, Chi Mei Optoelectronics Co., LTD. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Defrancisco v. AU Optronics Corp. et al
as 3:2007cv05020
Plaintiff: Mauricio Defrancisco and Mauricio Defrancisco
Defendant: AU Optronics Corp., AU Optronics Corp. America, Chi Mei Optoelectronics Co., LTD. and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 25 Clayton Act
Eisler v. AU Optronics Corp. et al
as 3:2007cv05019
Plaintiff: Scott Eisler
Defendant: AU Optronics Corp., AU Optronics Corp. America, Chi Mei Optoelectronics Co., LTD. and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 15 Antitrust Litigation
Weingarten v. AU Optronics Corp. et al
as 3:2007cv04931
Plaintiff: Marcia Weingarten, Marcia Weingarten, Marcia Weingarten and others
Defendant: AU Optronics Corp., AU Optronics Corp. America, Chi Mei Optoelectronics Co., LTD. and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1 Antitrust Litigation
Pulasky v. AU Optronics Corp. et al
as 3:2007cv04934
Plaintiff: John Pulasky
Defendant: AU Optronics Corp., AU Optronics Corp. America, Chi Mei Optoelectronics Co., LTD. and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 25 Clayton Act

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?