Cases 21 - 30 of 1,551
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2024cv01767
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 46 U.S.C. § 1156 Administrative Procedure Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2024cv01724
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 551 Administrative Procedure Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2024cv02200
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 08 U.S.C. § 1329 Writ of Mandamus to Adjudicate Visa Petition
Abdulsalam et al v. Mayorkas et al
as 2:2024at00295
Plaintiff:
Mohammed Abdulsalam and Sherifat Abdulsalam
Defendant:
Alejandro Mayorkas, Ur M Jaddou, Ted H. Kim and others
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 702 Administrative Procedure Act
Abdulsalam et al v. Mayorkas et al
as 2:2024cv00779
Plaintiff:
Mohammed Abdulsalam and Sherifat Abdulsalam
Defendant:
Alejandro Mayorkas, Ur M. Jaddou, Ted H. Kim and others
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 702 Administrative Procedure Act
United States of America v. Ghacham
as 24-1402
Defendant:
MOHAMED DAOUD GHACHAM and Moe Ghacham
Plaintiff:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Marlon Antonio Munguia et al v. Penske Truck Leasing, Co. et al
as 2:2024cv01887
Plaintiff:
Marlon Antonio Munguia
Petitioner:
MKTS, LLC
Defendant:
Penske Truck Leasing, Co., Mohammed Nezar-Hatem al Hijazi, Doe and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Notice of Removal - Personal Injury
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2024cv01311
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101 Americans w/ Disabilities Act (ADA)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2024cv00654
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2024cv01181
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101 Americans w/ Disabilities Act (ADA)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
