Cases 21 - 30 of 44
William Washington v. Stuart Sherman
as 18-55048
Petitioner - Appellant:
WILLIAM NATHANIEL WASHINGTON
Respondent - Appellee:
STUART SHERMAN, Warden
William Washington v. Marc Diamond
as 17-56460
Plaintiff - Appellant:
WILLIAM NATHANIEL WASHINGTON
Defendant - Appellant:
MARC DIAMOND, Los Angeles Police Department Detective, individual and official capacities
William Washington, et al v. Keefe Commissary Network, et al
as 17-56311
Plaintiff - Appellant:
WILLIAM NATHANIEL WASHINGTON
Plaintiff:
MICHAEL MCCARNS, GEOFF MILLS and DAVID BABTKIS
Defendant - Appellee:
KEEFE COMMISSARY NETWORK and THOMAS KEEFE, President
William Washington, et al v. Global TelLink Corporation, et al
as 17-56300
Plaintiff - Appellant:
WILLIAM NATHANIEL WASHINGTON
Plaintiff:
MICHAEL MCCARNS, GEOFF MILLS and DAVID BABTKIS
Defendant - Appellee:
GLOBAL TELLINK CORPORATION and BRIAN OLIVER, Chief Executive Officer
William Nathaniel Washington v. Jim McDonnell et al
as 2:2017cv05528
Defendant:
County Asst Hopper, County Asst Hopper, Sheriff Jim McDonnell and others
Plaintiff:
William Nathaniel Washington
William Nathaniel Washington et al v. Keefe Commissary Network et al
as 2:2017cv05311
Plaintiff:
David Babtkis, Michael Mccarns, Geoff Mills and others
Defendant:
Thomas Keefe and Keefe Commissary Network
William Nathaniel Washington et al v. Global Tel Link Corporation
as 2:2017cv05312
Plaintiff:
David Babtkis, Michael Mccarns, Geoff Mills and others
Defendant:
Global Tel Link Corporation and Brian D. Oliver
William Nathaniel Washington v. Marc Diamond
as 2:2017cv00666
Defendant:
Marc Diamond and Marc Diamond
Plaintiff:
William Nathaniel Washington
Washington v. Lewis
as 2:2016cv03041
Plaintiff:
William Nathaniel Washington
Defendant:
J. Lewis
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983
William Nathaniel Washington v. Eric Arnold
as 2:2016cv08312
Respondent:
Eric Arnold
Petitioner:
William Nathaniel Washington
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
