Cases 21 - 30 of 75
Flowers v. USA
as 3:2016cv01229
Petitioner:
James Neil Flowers
Respondent:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentence
Wells v. Nass et al
as 2:2016cv00582
Defendant:
Roybn M. Anderson, Vicki Applegate, Kelly Ashton and others
Plaintiff:
Leroy Lamont Wells
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Wells v. Byl et al
as 2:2016cv00422
Defendant:
Neil F. Byl, Megan Door, Alex Gardner and others
Plaintiff:
Leroy Lamont Wells
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Wells v. Kruse et al
as 2:2016cv00423
Defendant:
Neil F. Byl, Michael Casey, C. Criswell and others
Plaintiff:
Leroy Lamont Wells
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Harrington v. State of Oregon et al
as 1:2016cv00200
Defendant:
Jeff Allison, Brenda Bateman, Brad Bennet and others
Plaintiff:
Gary Allen Harrington
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Wells v. Kruse et al
as 2:2015cv02130
Defendant:
Marc Brown, Neil F. Byl, Peter Gartlan and others
Plaintiff:
Leroy Lamont Wells
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
O'Neil v. Commissioner Social Security Administration
as 6:2015cv01752
Defendant:
Commissioner Social Security Administration
Plaintiff:
Melissa L. O'Neil
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1383 Review of HHS Decision
Wells v. Kruse et al
as 2:2015cv01630
Defendant:
Neil F. Byl, Megan Doak, Daniel R. Kruse and others
Superior:
OPDS
Plaintiff:
Leroy Wells
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights
Wells v. Byl
as 2:2015cv01568
Defendant:
Neil F. Byl
Plaintiff:
Leroy Wells
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Wells v. Kruse et al
as 2:2015cv01527
Defendant:
Marc Brown, Neil F. Byl, Peter Gartlen and others
Plaintiff:
Leroy Wells
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
