Cases 21 - 28 of 28
William Michael Elliott v. Amcord, Inc. et al
as 2:2013cv05606
Defendant:
A.H. Bennett Company, AFC-Holcroft, L.L.C., Air Products and Chemicals, Inc. and others
Plaintiff:
William Michael Elliott
Kuhnau et al v. Allied Packing & Supply, Inc. et al
as 3:2013cv01669
Plaintiff:
Jeanene Kuhnau , Donald Kuhnau and Diana Williams
Defendant:
Allied Packing & Supply, Inc., Ameron International Corporation, Armstrong International, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Thomas v. Foster Wheeler LLC
as 3:2013cv01618
Plaintiff:
Bobbie E. Thomas
Defendant:
Foster Wheeler LLC , Air & Liquid Systems Corporation, Allied Packing & Supply Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1442 Petition for Removal
Mathis et al v. Air & Liquid Systems Corporation et al
as 3:2013cv05243
Plaintiff:
Doreen Mathis
Defendant:
Air & Liquid Systems Corporation , Armstrong International Inc , Carrier Corporation and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1442 Notice of Removal
Robare et al v. AC And S, Inc. et al
as 3:2012cv01291
Plaintiff:
Gordon Robare and Joan Robare
Defendant:
AC And S, Inc., A.W. Chesterton Company, Air & Liquid Systems Corporation and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Bond et al v. A.W. Chesterton Company et al
as 3:2011cv04199
Plaintiff:
Marisa Bond and Allen Pagan
Defendant:
A.W. Chesterton Company, Abb, Inc., Gould, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1442
Donlon v. AC and S, Inc. et al
as 4:2011cv03376
Plaintiff:
Patti Donlon and Sean Donlon
Defendant:
AC And S, Inc., Asbestos Corporation, Ltd., A.W. Chesterton Company and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Donlon v. AC and S, Inc. et al
as 3:2011cv03376
Plaintiff:
Patti Donlon and Sean Donlon
Defendant:
AC And S, Inc., Asbestos Corporation, Ltd., A.W. Chesterton Company and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Asbestos Litigation
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
